Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8321 - 8330 of 82870 for case search.
Search results 8321 - 8330 of 82870 for case search.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
whether a search or seizure is “reasonable,” courts first examine whether the initial interference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76455 - 2014-09-15
whether a search or seizure is “reasonable,” courts first examine whether the initial interference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76455 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Carlos Facundo
was sufficient to sustain the verdict; (2) whether the case should have been dismissed for prosecutorial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11557 - 2017-09-19
was sufficient to sustain the verdict; (2) whether the case should have been dismissed for prosecutorial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11557 - 2017-09-19
State v. Carlos Facundo
was sufficient to sustain the verdict; (2) whether the case should have been dismissed for prosecutorial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11557 - 2005-03-31
was sufficient to sustain the verdict; (2) whether the case should have been dismissed for prosecutorial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11557 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that Palmersheim had committed a jailable offense, and exigent circumstances—in this case, that the officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223908 - 2018-11-14
that Palmersheim had committed a jailable offense, and exigent circumstances—in this case, that the officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223908 - 2018-11-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is consistent with Fourth Amendment cases where evidence relevant to the constitutionality of a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145694 - 2017-09-21
is consistent with Fourth Amendment cases where evidence relevant to the constitutionality of a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145694 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
it applied retroactively, that the blood draw was an unreasonable search in violation of the Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145694 - 2015-08-03
it applied retroactively, that the blood draw was an unreasonable search in violation of the Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145694 - 2015-08-03
[PDF]
State v. Wameng Vang
of a given case constitute probable cause to arrest is a question of law that we decide independently. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5519 - 2017-09-19
of a given case constitute probable cause to arrest is a question of law that we decide independently. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5519 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Park Manor Limited v. Department of Health and Family Services
decision, that its ruling was a finding of fact and that this court should search the record for evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14138 - 2014-09-15
decision, that its ruling was a finding of fact and that this court should search the record for evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14138 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
unreasonable searches and seizures. U.S. Const. amend. IV; Wis. Const. art. I, § 11. “Subject to a few well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59077 - 2011-01-19
unreasonable searches and seizures. U.S. Const. amend. IV; Wis. Const. art. I, § 11. “Subject to a few well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59077 - 2011-01-19
[PDF]
Jesse Hardy Swinson v. Gary R. McCaughtry
other claims are without merit. Accordingly, we affirm. ¶2 This case arises out of a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4265 - 2017-09-19
other claims are without merit. Accordingly, we affirm. ¶2 This case arises out of a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4265 - 2017-09-19