Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8321 - 8330 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
Search results 8321 - 8330 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS
the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that [appellate courts] review de novo. If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93970 - 2013-03-11
the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that [appellate courts] review de novo. If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93970 - 2013-03-11
[PDF]
Nicolet Minerals Company v. Town of Nashville
review is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. No. 01-1339 5 Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3974 - 2017-09-20
review is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. No. 01-1339 5 Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3974 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
it was owed. II. ¶16 We review de novo a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment. Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29708 - 2007-07-16
it was owed. II. ¶16 We review de novo a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment. Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29708 - 2007-07-16
[PDF]
State v. Thomas W. Pfeifer
; this presents Nos. 98-2592-CR 98-2593-CR 6 a question of law, which we decide de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14466 - 2017-09-21
; this presents Nos. 98-2592-CR 98-2593-CR 6 a question of law, which we decide de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14466 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Bryan P. Weiler
, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: ROBERT DE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26014 - 2017-09-21
, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: ROBERT DE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26014 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Raquel R. S. and K.B. v. Necedah Area School District
¶11 We review the grant or denial of a summary judgment de novo, and we apply the same standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5037 - 2017-09-19
¶11 We review the grant or denial of a summary judgment de novo, and we apply the same standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5037 - 2017-09-19
State v. Donald Edward Weston
was deficient and prejudicial” de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d 121, 127‑28, 449 N.W.2d 845, 848 (1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10654 - 2005-03-31
was deficient and prejudicial” de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d 121, 127‑28, 449 N.W.2d 845, 848 (1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10654 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
an order granting or denying summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44979 - 2009-12-22
an order granting or denying summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44979 - 2009-12-22
Mark E. Hoppe v. Town of Porter Board of Adjustment
de novo. State ex rel. Whiting v. Kolb, 158 Wis.2d 226, 233, 461 N.W.2d 816, 819 (Ct. App. 1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13614 - 2005-03-31
de novo. State ex rel. Whiting v. Kolb, 158 Wis.2d 226, 233, 461 N.W.2d 816, 819 (Ct. App. 1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13614 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
this court reviews de novo. See Stuligross v. Stuligross, 2009 WI App 25, ¶9, 316 Wis. 2d 344, 763 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131707 - 2014-12-15
this court reviews de novo. See Stuligross v. Stuligross, 2009 WI App 25, ¶9, 316 Wis. 2d 344, 763 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131707 - 2014-12-15