Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8321 - 8330 of 68502 for did.
Search results 8321 - 8330 of 68502 for did.
State v. David William Newbury
the trial court did not erroneously exercise its sentencing discretion, and because the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8719 - 2005-03-31
the trial court did not erroneously exercise its sentencing discretion, and because the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8719 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
recklessly endangering safety, he did not enter his No. 2008AP890-CR 2 plea knowingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36196 - 2014-09-15
recklessly endangering safety, he did not enter his No. 2008AP890-CR 2 plea knowingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36196 - 2014-09-15
Dean Medical Center v. Karri P. Hubanks
. When Dean did not receive payment for these services, it filed a small claims collection action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13364 - 2005-03-31
. When Dean did not receive payment for these services, it filed a small claims collection action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13364 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
constitutionally ineffective representation because the lawyer did not raise the issue of his trial lawyer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78581 - 2014-09-15
constitutionally ineffective representation because the lawyer did not raise the issue of his trial lawyer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78581 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
that, acting in conformity with her babysitting habits, she did not act violently toward Mason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49568 - 2014-09-15
that, acting in conformity with her babysitting habits, she did not act violently toward Mason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49568 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
as a “former client” under SCR 20:1.9(a)(2). The mother’s attorney responded that she did not “represent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192365 - 2017-09-21
as a “former client” under SCR 20:1.9(a)(2). The mother’s attorney responded that she did not “represent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192365 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
side. During cross-examination, D.H. testified that he did not file an insurance claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=718650 - 2023-10-24
side. During cross-examination, D.H. testified that he did not file an insurance claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=718650 - 2023-10-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on the petition. L.M. did not appear. The State indicated that it had attempted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=421023 - 2021-09-08
on the petition. L.M. did not appear. The State indicated that it had attempted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=421023 - 2021-09-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the officers did not accept the refusal and instead walked into the home. ¶7 Warrior argued that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89201 - 2014-09-15
that the officers did not accept the refusal and instead walked into the home. ¶7 Warrior argued that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89201 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
years before and did not have keys to the storage unit. The firearms were in the defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45608 - 2014-09-15
years before and did not have keys to the storage unit. The firearms were in the defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45608 - 2014-09-15