Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8321 - 8330 of 69114 for he.
Search results 8321 - 8330 of 69114 for he.
State v. Lorenzo Winford
-degree intentional homicide. See § 940.05(1)(b), Stats.[1] He also appeals from an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11881 - 2005-03-31
-degree intentional homicide. See § 940.05(1)(b), Stats.[1] He also appeals from an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11881 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Dale W. Repinski
that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel at sentencing because defense counsel failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10180 - 2017-09-19
that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel at sentencing because defense counsel failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10180 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for reconsideration. He raises three claims on appeal: (1) the enterprise rule he was found to have violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90908 - 2014-09-15
for reconsideration. He raises three claims on appeal: (1) the enterprise rule he was found to have violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90908 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Eric A. Paarmann
relief. He challenges the vehicle search and the performance of trial counsel. We reject his claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13294 - 2017-09-21
relief. He challenges the vehicle search and the performance of trial counsel. We reject his claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13294 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
injunction, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 813.12(4), 813.12(8)(a), and 968.075(1)(a) (2011-12).[1] He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123250 - 2014-10-06
injunction, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 813.12(4), 813.12(8)(a), and 968.075(1)(a) (2011-12).[1] He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123250 - 2014-10-06
[PDF]
Caren C. v. Robin M.
slant on the testimony that he was the sole breadwinner for a “significant period of time” is belied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3699 - 2017-09-19
slant on the testimony that he was the sole breadwinner for a “significant period of time” is belied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3699 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was driving a car with the couple’s two children in the backseat and he then ran away from police when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=733988 - 2023-11-28
was driving a car with the couple’s two children in the backseat and he then ran away from police when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=733988 - 2023-11-28
COURT OF APPEALS
of operating a motor vehicle with a prohibited alcohol concentration (second offense).[2] He appeals, claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49411 - 2010-04-28
of operating a motor vehicle with a prohibited alcohol concentration (second offense).[2] He appeals, claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49411 - 2010-04-28
[PDF]
Caren C. v. Robin M.
slant on the testimony that he was the sole breadwinner for a “significant period of time” is belied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3701 - 2017-09-19
slant on the testimony that he was the sole breadwinner for a “significant period of time” is belied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3701 - 2017-09-19
State v. Dale W. Repinski
sentence. Repinski contends that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel at sentencing because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10179 - 2005-03-31
sentence. Repinski contends that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel at sentencing because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10179 - 2005-03-31