Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8321 - 8330 of 20932 for word.
Search results 8321 - 8330 of 20932 for word.
COURT OF APPEALS
“approval of a driveway permit, land division, and site plans for primary farm residences.” In other words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33851 - 2008-08-27
“approval of a driveway permit, land division, and site plans for primary farm residences.” In other words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33851 - 2008-08-27
CA Blank Order
oral discussion referred to in the note. In other words, that the oral discussion is incorporated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103379 - 2013-10-21
oral discussion referred to in the note. In other words, that the oral discussion is incorporated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103379 - 2013-10-21
James R. Schilling v. State of Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
). In other words, there is a taking if a restriction “practically or substantially renders the land useless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6856 - 2005-03-31
). In other words, there is a taking if a restriction “practically or substantially renders the land useless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6856 - 2005-03-31
State v. James D. Krause
. Judge Race’s signature on that document is predicated with the words, “As stated on Judgment dated 8/27
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3196 - 2005-03-31
. Judge Race’s signature on that document is predicated with the words, “As stated on Judgment dated 8/27
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3196 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Patrick B.
argues that the word “or” between visit or communicate in § 48.415(1)(b), STATS., should be read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12290 - 2017-09-21
argues that the word “or” between visit or communicate in § 48.415(1)(b), STATS., should be read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12290 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
a reasonable person would understand the words to mean under the circumstances. Id. When the contract
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63041 - 2014-09-15
a reasonable person would understand the words to mean under the circumstances. Id. When the contract
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63041 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was slurred. ¶9 When Finger asked Gembicki what happened, he twice used the word “I” before switching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80828 - 2014-09-15
was slurred. ¶9 When Finger asked Gembicki what happened, he twice used the word “I” before switching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80828 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
to the various statutes. As stated by the respondent: [t]he deletion of the words “writ of” by Ch. 289, 1981
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56175 - 2014-09-15
to the various statutes. As stated by the respondent: [t]he deletion of the words “writ of” by Ch. 289, 1981
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56175 - 2014-09-15
State v. Joseph Scaro
jurisdictions in support of his argument.[3] While these cases are of interest, we echo the words of the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15391 - 2005-03-31
jurisdictions in support of his argument.[3] While these cases are of interest, we echo the words of the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15391 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Village of Elm Grove v. Laura L. Gillilan
in-court identification had been made of her. In other words, the Village’s counsel never asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15223 - 2017-09-21
in-court identification had been made of her. In other words, the Village’s counsel never asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15223 - 2017-09-21