Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8331 - 8340 of 69076 for he.
Search results 8331 - 8340 of 69076 for he.
State v. John S. Bergmann
sentences. He raises fourteen arguments in this appeal, most of which are based on the premise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14344 - 2005-03-31
sentences. He raises fourteen arguments in this appeal, most of which are based on the premise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14344 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dale W. Repinski
sentence. Repinski contends that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel at sentencing because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10179 - 2005-03-31
sentence. Repinski contends that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel at sentencing because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10179 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and conviction resulted from this accident. ¶3 Catlin’s defense at trial was that he was not driving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29450 - 2007-06-20
and conviction resulted from this accident. ¶3 Catlin’s defense at trial was that he was not driving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29450 - 2007-06-20
State v. Dale W. Repinski
sentence. Repinski contends that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel at sentencing because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10181 - 2005-03-31
sentence. Repinski contends that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel at sentencing because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10181 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
-04) had expired,1 Cervantes-Carrillo sought sentence modification pro se, arguing that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28631 - 2014-09-15
-04) had expired,1 Cervantes-Carrillo sought sentence modification pro se, arguing that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28631 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Caren C. v. Robin M.
slant on the testimony that he was the sole breadwinner for a “significant period of time” is belied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3699 - 2017-09-19
slant on the testimony that he was the sole breadwinner for a “significant period of time” is belied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3699 - 2017-09-19
State v. Gerald D. Taylor
. On September 30, 1999, he entered no contest pleas to both charges pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7102 - 2005-03-31
. On September 30, 1999, he entered no contest pleas to both charges pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7102 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert E. Morrison
Francis Rotter testified that he saw Morrison and Michael Kleban leave Morrison's apartment building, get
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8166 - 2005-03-31
Francis Rotter testified that he saw Morrison and Michael Kleban leave Morrison's apartment building, get
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8166 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
with a prohibited alcohol concentration (second offense).2 He appeals, claiming that the circuit court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49411 - 2014-09-15
with a prohibited alcohol concentration (second offense).2 He appeals, claiming that the circuit court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49411 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
injunction, contrary to WIS. STAT. §§ 813.12(4), 813.12(8)(a), and 968.075(1)(a) (2011-12). 1 He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123250 - 2017-09-21
injunction, contrary to WIS. STAT. §§ 813.12(4), 813.12(8)(a), and 968.075(1)(a) (2011-12). 1 He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123250 - 2017-09-21