Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8331 - 8340 of 63904 for records.
Search results 8331 - 8340 of 63904 for records.
CA Blank Order
was advised of his right to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138821 - 2015-03-30
was advised of his right to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138821 - 2015-03-30
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95064 - 2013-04-02
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95064 - 2013-04-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211783 - 2018-04-23
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211783 - 2018-04-23
CA Blank Order
our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125490 - 2014-11-03
our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125490 - 2014-11-03
State v. Bradley K. Perkins
. However, nothing in the record supports his contention that the trial court believed otherwise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8829 - 2005-03-31
. However, nothing in the record supports his contention that the trial court believed otherwise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8829 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106576 - 2014-01-13
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106576 - 2014-01-13
CA Blank Order
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117402 - 2014-07-22
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117402 - 2014-07-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postdisposition counsel argued that there was no evidence in the record that D.L. disobeyed a court order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=534131 - 2022-06-21
postdisposition counsel argued that there was no evidence in the record that D.L. disobeyed a court order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=534131 - 2022-06-21
[PDF]
WI App 59
, the court was required to expunge his record on the three counts for which he was placed on probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=280581 - 2020-10-13
, the court was required to expunge his record on the three counts for which he was placed on probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=280581 - 2020-10-13
[PDF]
WI APP 16
The meeting was open to the public through a link on the school district website. A recording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910614 - 2025-04-21
The meeting was open to the public through a link on the school district website. A recording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910614 - 2025-04-21