Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8341 - 8350 of 12050 for ch.

State v. Ronald G. Fedler
it is not a ch. 227 review of the denial of a permit. It would be in a contested case hearing that Fedler could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4448 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
by the court to No. 2021AP1141-NM 4 act within any of WIS. STAT. ch. 48’s designated time
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=418595 - 2021-08-31

[PDF] Joseph P. Krause v. Myre Electric, Inc.
licensed under ch. 452 while that person is engaged in real estate practice, as defined in s. 452.01(6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2118 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Appeal No. 2008AP755-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2007CF324
, a Class H felony, WIS. STAT. ch. 961, and possession of drug paraphernalia, WIS. STAT. § 961.573(1).2
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37030 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Richard Engberg v. Brett Eric Reetz
.” But, as the preamble to SCR ch. 20 states, “[v]iolation of a rule should not give rise to a cause of action nor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18323 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
) (a refusal hearing is a special proceeding and the discovery procedures of WIS. STAT. ch. 804 apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31959 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Randall G. Horlacher v. Eau Claire County Board of Land Use Appeals
CLAIRE COUNTY, WIS., ZONING CODE ch. 18.04 (2000) dealing with A-1 exclusive agricultural districts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4914 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
, as UWM explained occurred in this instance. We note that an objective of WIS. ADMIN. CODE ch. Adm 10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32921 - 2014-09-15

State v. James G. Langenbach
procedure in 1969. Laws of 1969, ch. 255, § 63. In 1987, the legislature replaced the statute codifying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3781 - 2005-03-31

State v. Christopher L.
general provision of ch. 938, Stats., which permits a juvenile court to extend dispositional orders. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13015 - 2005-03-31