Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8341 - 8350 of 30108 for consulta de causas.
Search results 8341 - 8350 of 30108 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS
. See Wis. Stat. § 805.16(4). Thus, § 805.16(4) establishes a de facto ninety-day hearing period
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85907 - 2012-08-13
. See Wis. Stat. § 805.16(4). Thus, § 805.16(4) establishes a de facto ninety-day hearing period
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85907 - 2012-08-13
State v. Roy L. Rogers
been knowingly and intelligently waived” are reviewed de novo. Id. at 18, 556 N.W.2d at 692
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13218 - 2005-03-31
been knowingly and intelligently waived” are reviewed de novo. Id. at 18, 556 N.W.2d at 692
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13218 - 2005-03-31
State v. Vernon L. Walker
the giving of an instruction is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. Additionally, a court errs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7786 - 2005-03-31
the giving of an instruction is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. Additionally, a court errs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7786 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to undisputed facts, which presents a question of law that we review de novo, while benefiting from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=923042 - 2025-03-04
to undisputed facts, which presents a question of law that we review de novo, while benefiting from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=923042 - 2025-03-04
Scott Alan Ludtke v. Department of Corrections
this court reviews de novo. See Gonzalez v. Teskey, 160 Wis.2d 1, 7, 465 N.W.2d 525, 528 (Ct. App. 1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10982 - 2005-03-31
this court reviews de novo. See Gonzalez v. Teskey, 160 Wis.2d 1, 7, 465 N.W.2d 525, 528 (Ct. App. 1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10982 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
500. Whether a party has standing is a question of law, which we review de novo. Chenequa Land
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62026 - 2011-03-28
500. Whether a party has standing is a question of law, which we review de novo. Chenequa Land
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62026 - 2011-03-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181718 - 2017-09-21
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181718 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 52
the meaning of both subsecs. (2)(a) and (2)(b), which is a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=704059 - 2023-11-14
the meaning of both subsecs. (2)(a) and (2)(b), which is a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=704059 - 2023-11-14
Grant County Department of Social Services v. Unified Board of Grant and Iowa Counties
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6245 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6245 - 2005-03-31
Michael F. Johnson v. Amanda A. Ziegler
¶5 We review a circuit court’s grant or denial of summary judgment de novo, owing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3448 - 2005-03-31
¶5 We review a circuit court’s grant or denial of summary judgment de novo, owing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3448 - 2005-03-31