Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8361 - 8370 of 29996 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
8 DISCUSSION ¶15 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. Duncan v. Asset Recovery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=388675 - 2021-07-13

[PDF] Lynda D. Dahlke v. James S. Dahlke
of law which we review de novo. Id. A substantial or material change in the circumstances should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4858 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Vincent C. Lewis
performance was deficient and prejudicial, present a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. at 128
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5598 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Nicolet Minerals Company v. Town of Nashville
review is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. No. 01-1339 5 Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3974 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] WI APP 32
court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, independently of the circuit court, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137950 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Christopher R. Hansen
of § 343.305, STATS., in relation to a given set of facts, however, is a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13108 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CCS North Henry, LLC v. Marge Tully
was sufficient, it requested a trial de novo in circuit court. After a trial to the court held December 29
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2318 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Thomas W. Pfeifer
; this presents Nos. 98-2592-CR 98-2593-CR 6 a question of law, which we decide de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14466 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. George F. Passarelli
are questions of law we review de novo. State v. Moats, 156 Wis.2d 74, 101, 457 N.W.2d 299, 311 (1990). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13819 - 2014-09-15

Brown County v. Marcella G.
was submitted on the brief of Thomas J. Walsh of Walsh & Walsh, S.C. of De Pere. COURT OF APPEALS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3818 - 2005-03-31