Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8371 - 8380 of 29996 for consulta de causas.
Search results 8371 - 8380 of 29996 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
CCS North Henry, LLC v. Marge Tully
was sufficient, it requested a trial de novo in circuit court. After a trial to the court held December 29
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2318 - 2017-09-19
was sufficient, it requested a trial de novo in circuit court. After a trial to the court held December 29
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2318 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Thomas W. Pfeifer
; this presents Nos. 98-2592-CR 98-2593-CR 6 a question of law, which we decide de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14466 - 2017-09-21
; this presents Nos. 98-2592-CR 98-2593-CR 6 a question of law, which we decide de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14466 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. George F. Passarelli
are questions of law we review de novo. State v. Moats, 156 Wis.2d 74, 101, 457 N.W.2d 299, 311 (1990). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13819 - 2014-09-15
are questions of law we review de novo. State v. Moats, 156 Wis.2d 74, 101, 457 N.W.2d 299, 311 (1990). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13819 - 2014-09-15
Brown County v. Marcella G.
was submitted on the brief of Thomas J. Walsh of Walsh & Walsh, S.C. of De Pere. COURT OF APPEALS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3818 - 2005-03-31
was submitted on the brief of Thomas J. Walsh of Walsh & Walsh, S.C. of De Pere. COURT OF APPEALS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3818 - 2005-03-31
State v. Wesley Michael Lund
, presents a question of law that we decide de novo. State v. Penzkofer, 184 Wis. 2d 262, 264, 516 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7335 - 2005-03-31
, presents a question of law that we decide de novo. State v. Penzkofer, 184 Wis. 2d 262, 264, 516 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7335 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Josephine Artac v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
of law that we review de novo. See Tannler v. DHSS, 211 Wis. 2d 179, 183, 564 N.W.2d 735 (1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15626 - 2017-09-21
of law that we review de novo. See Tannler v. DHSS, 211 Wis. 2d 179, 183, 564 N.W.2d 735 (1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15626 - 2017-09-21
2010 WI APP 17
. Stat. Rule 802.08(2). We review de novo a circuit court’s summary-judgment decision, and apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44861 - 2010-01-26
. Stat. Rule 802.08(2). We review de novo a circuit court’s summary-judgment decision, and apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44861 - 2010-01-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). This is a question of law we review de novo “based on the specific factual allegations made and the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=479163 - 2022-02-01
). This is a question of law we review de novo “based on the specific factual allegations made and the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=479163 - 2022-02-01
[PDF]
Dan Danbeck v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
in the amount of $20,000. DISCUSSION ¶5 We review the grant or denial of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15455 - 2017-09-21
in the amount of $20,000. DISCUSSION ¶5 We review the grant or denial of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15455 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Charles A. Kramer v. Board of Education of the School District of the Menomonie Area
compensation that he received during the two-year contract period presents a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3431 - 2017-09-19
compensation that he received during the two-year contract period presents a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3431 - 2017-09-19