Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8381 - 8390 of 16449 for commenting.
Search results 8381 - 8390 of 16449 for commenting.
State v. Amany E.
this assertion. The court did comment in passing at the conclusion of its decision that it “would decline
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2244 - 2005-03-31
this assertion. The court did comment in passing at the conclusion of its decision that it “would decline
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2244 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
court commented: [T]he credible evidence is that [James] is not totally disabled with a back condition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29679 - 2007-07-17
court commented: [T]he credible evidence is that [James] is not totally disabled with a back condition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29679 - 2007-07-17
State v. Dionysus J. Thomas
not object to the prosecutor’s comments because he did not want to disturb the plea agreement, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20516 - 2005-12-06
not object to the prosecutor’s comments because he did not want to disturb the plea agreement, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20516 - 2005-12-06
[PDF]
NOTICE
, which would be Silvers, made repeated comments that James had “talk[ed] shit” to him earlier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52620 - 2014-09-15
, which would be Silvers, made repeated comments that James had “talk[ed] shit” to him earlier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52620 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Gerald Seay
comments, Seay offered a version of the underlying events which tended to exonerate him: he alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13899 - 2014-09-15
comments, Seay offered a version of the underlying events which tended to exonerate him: he alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13899 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to briefly comment on the parties’ arguments. ¶8 First, Rueden’s reliance on State v. Huebner, 2000 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83377 - 2014-09-15
to briefly comment on the parties’ arguments. ¶8 First, Rueden’s reliance on State v. Huebner, 2000 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83377 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. At the discharge hearing, the trial court commented on the “lasting effect” of the “Australian letters.” Olson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95381 - 2014-09-15
. At the discharge hearing, the trial court commented on the “lasting effect” of the “Australian letters.” Olson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95381 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was remorseful and considered that remorse in imposing sentence. The sentencing court’s comments indicate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798586 - 2024-05-09
was remorseful and considered that remorse in imposing sentence. The sentencing court’s comments indicate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798586 - 2024-05-09
State v. Eric J. Yelk
and commented on their collective seriousness and their impact on Yelk’s victims. It considered the character
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11854 - 2005-03-31
and commented on their collective seriousness and their impact on Yelk’s victims. It considered the character
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11854 - 2005-03-31
State v. Eric J. Yelk
and commented on their collective seriousness and their impact on Yelk’s victims. It considered the character
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11853 - 2005-03-31
and commented on their collective seriousness and their impact on Yelk’s victims. It considered the character
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11853 - 2005-03-31