Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8381 - 8390 of 68249 for did.
Search results 8381 - 8390 of 68249 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Steven J. Keizer
affirm. No. 94-2881-CR -2- At his jury trial, Keizer did not dispute that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8226 - 2017-09-19
affirm. No. 94-2881-CR -2- At his jury trial, Keizer did not dispute that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8226 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as well as the elements of th[e]se offenses. Although he asserts that he did not understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74805 - 2014-09-15
as well as the elements of th[e]se offenses. Although he asserts that he did not understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74805 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Janusz Daca
” notice pursuant to Wisconsin’s Implied Consent Law, WIS. STAT. § 343.305(4). Vasquez did not give Daca
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7360 - 2017-09-20
” notice pursuant to Wisconsin’s Implied Consent Law, WIS. STAT. § 343.305(4). Vasquez did not give Daca
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7360 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
did not erroneously exercise its discretion in denying an evidentiary hearing. Witt lived with his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213185 - 2018-05-23
did not erroneously exercise its discretion in denying an evidentiary hearing. Witt lived with his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213185 - 2018-05-23
[PDF]
County of Adams v. Daniel M. Ciesla
court did not err in directing a guilty verdict. Accordingly, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Ciesla
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15461 - 2017-09-21
court did not err in directing a guilty verdict. Accordingly, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Ciesla
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15461 - 2017-09-21
State v. Richard C. Plank
, 2003, the court accepted Plank’s no contest plea. At the plea hearing, the court did not personally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17796 - 2005-05-24
, 2003, the court accepted Plank’s no contest plea. At the plea hearing, the court did not personally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17796 - 2005-05-24
State v. David William Newbury
the trial court did not erroneously exercise its sentencing discretion, and because the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8719 - 2005-03-31
the trial court did not erroneously exercise its sentencing discretion, and because the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8719 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of this cocaine.” Defense counsel protested that the State’s previous discovery response did not disclose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29342 - 2007-06-12
of this cocaine.” Defense counsel protested that the State’s previous discovery response did not disclose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29342 - 2007-06-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on the petition. L.M. did not appear. The State indicated that it had attempted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=421023 - 2021-09-08
on the petition. L.M. did not appear. The State indicated that it had attempted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=421023 - 2021-09-08
Brown County Department of Health & Human Services v. Kimberly A.M.
a confidential conversation with the judge. Kimberly’s trial counsel did not attend the interview. No record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4187 - 2005-03-31
a confidential conversation with the judge. Kimberly’s trial counsel did not attend the interview. No record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4187 - 2005-03-31