Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8381 - 8390 of 58596 for speedy trial.

James M. Esselman v. Rosemarie C. Esselman
judgment. She contends that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by determining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6987 - 2005-03-31

State v. Norgie Vieras
for postconviction relief. We conclude that the trial court's inferences about the possibility of emotional harm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9528 - 2005-03-31

Frances A. Lease v. William G. Skalitzky
below, however, we conclude that the trial court properly exercised its discretion and affirm the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2599 - 2005-03-31

State v. Parish M. Golden
ineffective assistance of trial counsel and whether the trial court erred in the procedure it used to select
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2432 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Dennis C. Marth
assistance of trial counsel claim. On appeal, Marth argues that his trial counsel was ineffective. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5075 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Steven C. Wizner
to sentencing is addressed to the discretion of the trial court. See State v. Garcia, 192 Wis.2d 845, 861
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12183 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Norgie Vieras
that the trial court's inferences about the possibility of emotional harm to Vieras' children who witnessed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9528 - 2017-09-19

William M. Jacoby v. Jo Ellen Jacoby
with a maintenance award of indefinite duration. He claims that the trial court erred by failing to find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4930 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Bradford Lescher
clinics. Lescher claims that the trial court erred in issuing a contempt order against him because: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8059 - 2017-09-19

State v. Bradford F. Lescher
modification. Lescher claims the trial court erred in imposing a sixty-day electronic surveillance sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9238 - 2005-03-31