Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8391 - 8400 of 50107 for our.
Search results 8391 - 8400 of 50107 for our.
State v. Ellis H.
of this appeal turns on our construction of Wis. Stat. § 938.355(6)(d). Statutory interpretation is considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7080 - 2005-03-31
of this appeal turns on our construction of Wis. Stat. § 938.355(6)(d). Statutory interpretation is considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7080 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Carol Marie Bannigan v. Jeffrey Harold Johnson
2 It is not entirely clear from our past discussions of the issue whether a voluntary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15613 - 2017-09-21
2 It is not entirely clear from our past discussions of the issue whether a voluntary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15613 - 2017-09-21
State v. Mario D. Tye
to substantiate his claim that he should be granted the right to withdraw his plea. We trust our efforts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20594 - 2005-12-12
to substantiate his claim that he should be granted the right to withdraw his plea. We trust our efforts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20594 - 2005-12-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the totality of the circumstances, Words received a fair trial, and our confidence in the result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=814654 - 2024-06-18
the totality of the circumstances, Words received a fair trial, and our confidence in the result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=814654 - 2024-06-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was pending, Jackson requested that we consider, on our own motion, certifying his case to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218177 - 2018-08-28
was pending, Jackson requested that we consider, on our own motion, certifying his case to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218177 - 2018-08-28
State v. Rock K. Ingram
challenges to the trial court's discretionary control over the admission of evidence. Under our deferential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9882 - 2005-03-31
challenges to the trial court's discretionary control over the admission of evidence. Under our deferential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9882 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Anthony D.B.
of disabling condition. Our conclusions in this case are limited to individuals committed pursuant to ch
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17370 - 2017-09-21
of disabling condition. Our conclusions in this case are limited to individuals committed pursuant to ch
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17370 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 6, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
the quality of the representation. We do not substitute our judgment but examine the court’s explanation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28300 - 2007-03-05
the quality of the representation. We do not substitute our judgment but examine the court’s explanation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28300 - 2007-03-05
[PDF]
WI APP 184
, and the scope of our review is the same as the circuit court’s. See Target Stores v. LIRC, 217 Wis. 2d 1, 11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29761 - 2014-09-15
, and the scope of our review is the same as the circuit court’s. See Target Stores v. LIRC, 217 Wis. 2d 1, 11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29761 - 2014-09-15
Dean Deback v. James E. White, M.D.
exercise our discretionary reversal power pursuant to § 752.35, Stats., to reverse the judgment. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10699 - 2005-03-31
exercise our discretionary reversal power pursuant to § 752.35, Stats., to reverse the judgment. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10699 - 2005-03-31