Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 841 - 850 of 81718 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.
Search results 841 - 850 of 81718 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.
[PDF]
WI APP 27
of the extraction and testing of the first sample. No. 2022AP882-CR 7 autosomal DNA profile.9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=795011 - 2024-06-20
of the extraction and testing of the first sample. No. 2022AP882-CR 7 autosomal DNA profile.9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=795011 - 2024-06-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
No. 2012AP1189 3 to take a requested test. Christenson agreed to give a blood sample. Putzer testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88734 - 2014-09-15
No. 2012AP1189 3 to take a requested test. Christenson agreed to give a blood sample. Putzer testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88734 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
a requested test. Christenson agreed to give a blood sample. Putzer testified that “somebody” from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88734 - 2012-10-30
a requested test. Christenson agreed to give a blood sample. Putzer testified that “somebody” from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88734 - 2012-10-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for the “presence of fluids or biological material,” she “[did] testing for the presence of semen” and used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=333335 - 2021-02-09
for the “presence of fluids or biological material,” she “[did] testing for the presence of semen” and used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=333335 - 2021-02-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not be violated.” U.S. CONST. amend. IV. When law enforcement collects a blood sample for chemical testing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=894674 - 2024-12-26
not be violated.” U.S. CONST. amend. IV. When law enforcement collects a blood sample for chemical testing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=894674 - 2024-12-26
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 03, 2007 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
as 0.00. Subsequently, a sample of Holtz’s blood was drawn to be tested for controlled substances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27613 - 2007-01-02
as 0.00. Subsequently, a sample of Holtz’s blood was drawn to be tested for controlled substances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27613 - 2007-01-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Subsequently, a sample of Holtz’s blood was drawn to be tested for controlled substances. There were two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27613 - 2014-09-15
. Subsequently, a sample of Holtz’s blood was drawn to be tested for controlled substances. There were two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27613 - 2014-09-15
State v. Benjamin M.R.
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Clark County: MICHAEL W. BRENNAN, Judge. Affirmed in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10062 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Clark County: MICHAEL W. BRENNAN, Judge. Affirmed in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10062 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James S. Riedel
to obtain a search warrant before submitting his blood sample for testing. We reject Riedel’s argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5439 - 2017-09-19
to obtain a search warrant before submitting his blood sample for testing. We reject Riedel’s argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5439 - 2017-09-19
State v. James S. Riedel
a search warrant before submitting his blood sample for testing. We reject Riedel’s argument and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5439 - 2005-03-31
a search warrant before submitting his blood sample for testing. We reject Riedel’s argument and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5439 - 2005-03-31