Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 841 - 850 of 3426 for y's.
Search results 841 - 850 of 3426 for y's.
State v. Carl E. Vines, Sr.
responded, “[y]es,” and proceeded to enter his plea. At the close of this hearing, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13238 - 2005-03-31
responded, “[y]es,” and proceeded to enter his plea. At the close of this hearing, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13238 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
said, [y]ou know what? I admit it. This is what happened. I sexually assaulted [Sarah] but I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=609462 - 2023-01-10
said, [y]ou know what? I admit it. This is what happened. I sexually assaulted [Sarah] but I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=609462 - 2023-01-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
[because] [m]y decision was based on the totality of the evidence that was submitted during the trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=690774 - 2023-08-15
[because] [m]y decision was based on the totality of the evidence that was submitted during the trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=690774 - 2023-08-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
and with lawful authority, is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.” “[B]y its very terms, WIS. STAT. § 946.41(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31663 - 2014-09-15
and with lawful authority, is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.” “[B]y its very terms, WIS. STAT. § 946.41(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31663 - 2014-09-15
State v. Andrew D. Birmingham
and at the letter W he stopped or hesitated, when he resumed he skipped the letter X and stated Y, Z. The deputy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18733 - 2005-06-28
and at the letter W he stopped or hesitated, when he resumed he skipped the letter X and stated Y, Z. The deputy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18733 - 2005-06-28
Rudy Kopecky v. Nancy Lamar
that it would not approve the request because there was no documentation. At the hearing, Fay stated: [M]y
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8389 - 2005-03-31
that it would not approve the request because there was no documentation. At the hearing, Fay stated: [M]y
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8389 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of a Class A misdemeanor.” “[B]y its very terms, Wis. Stat. § 946.41(1) requires an officer to have ‘lawful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31663 - 2008-01-28
of a Class A misdemeanor.” “[B]y its very terms, Wis. Stat. § 946.41(1) requires an officer to have ‘lawful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31663 - 2008-01-28
[PDF]
State v. Thomas F.w.
., the issues he raises here "would always evade review because ... the[y] would always be rendered moot."4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9582 - 2017-09-19
., the issues he raises here "would always evade review because ... the[y] would always be rendered moot."4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9582 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
, which we review de novo. See Thomas Y. v. St. Croix County, 175 Wis. 2d 222, 227, 499 N.W.2d 218 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34800 - 2014-09-15
, which we review de novo. See Thomas Y. v. St. Croix County, 175 Wis. 2d 222, 227, 499 N.W.2d 218 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34800 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jonathon L. Norton
allegation, the complaint stated: [Y]our complainant has reviewed a teletype communication from the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9505 - 2005-03-31
allegation, the complaint stated: [Y]our complainant has reviewed a teletype communication from the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9505 - 2005-03-31