Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8401 - 8410 of 30108 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] State v. Charles B. Knudtson
de novo. Baker, 169 Wis. 2d at 78. 2 In his affidavit supporting his motion to exclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17890 - 2017-09-21

WI App 164 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case Nos.: 2009AP2266 2009AP2677 2009AP...
interpretation of an insurance policy, which is generally subject to de novo review. Welin v. American Family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56872 - 2010-12-13

[PDF] NOTICE
England is a matter of contract interpretation. We interpret a contract de novo, without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45914 - 2014-09-15

Nicolet Minerals Company v. Town of Nashville
as the trial court and our review is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3974 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
decision de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. See Konneker v. Romano, 2010 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=971385 - 2025-06-17

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to sustain a verdict of guilt in a criminal prosecution is a question of law, subject to our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=945880 - 2025-04-22

COURT OF APPEALS
of statutory interpretation de novo. State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶7, 281 Wis. 2d 484, 697 N.W.2d 769
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28962 - 2007-06-26

[PDF] Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Lori Ann Rasmus
decision to grant summary judgment de novo, as a question of law. M & I First Nat'l Bank v. Episcopal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13538 - 2017-09-21

2010 WI APP 17
. Stat. Rule 802.08(2). We review de novo a circuit court’s summary-judgment decision, and apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44861 - 2010-01-26

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. Id., ¶9. 3 In his appellant’s brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=381185 - 2021-06-29