Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8401 - 8410 of 24568 for extending.
Search results 8401 - 8410 of 24568 for extending.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for Buckholtz to visit out-of- state family on an extended basis, we are satisfied that the condition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164037 - 2017-09-21
for Buckholtz to visit out-of- state family on an extended basis, we are satisfied that the condition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164037 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
’ initial confinement. Stenschke was sentenced to six years’ initial confinement and ten years’ extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140013 - 2017-09-21
’ initial confinement. Stenschke was sentenced to six years’ initial confinement and ten years’ extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140013 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision. On the other count, the court withheld
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108054 - 2017-09-21
of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision. On the other count, the court withheld
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108054 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. On October 22, 2013, Martinez’s extended supervision was revoked. The Division of Hearings and Appeals
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226508 - 2018-11-07
. On October 22, 2013, Martinez’s extended supervision was revoked. The Division of Hearings and Appeals
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226508 - 2018-11-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and five years of extended supervision. It also imposed a $250 DNA surcharge. Jones filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228702 - 2018-11-28
and five years of extended supervision. It also imposed a $250 DNA surcharge. Jones filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228702 - 2018-11-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confinement and thirty months’ extended supervision. There is no manifest injustice upon which Sellers
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118947 - 2014-09-15
confinement and thirty months’ extended supervision. There is no manifest injustice upon which Sellers
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118947 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and one-half years’ extended supervision, concurrent, but consecutive to the sentence he already
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251766 - 2019-12-26
and one-half years’ extended supervision, concurrent, but consecutive to the sentence he already
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251766 - 2019-12-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the possibility of release on extended supervision and ordered to pay approximately $22,000 in restitution. DOC
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240407 - 2019-05-06
the possibility of release on extended supervision and ordered to pay approximately $22,000 in restitution. DOC
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240407 - 2019-05-06
CA Blank Order
’ extended supervision, stayed the sentence and placed Jump on probation for three years. The record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104032 - 2013-11-12
’ extended supervision, stayed the sentence and placed Jump on probation for three years. The record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104032 - 2013-11-12
CA Blank Order
of initial confinement and ten years of extended supervision. The no-merit report addresses whether Lee’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96748 - 2013-05-09
of initial confinement and ten years of extended supervision. The no-merit report addresses whether Lee’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96748 - 2013-05-09