Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8411 - 8420 of 30126 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] Martin Mellenthin v. Rodney Berger
of statutory interpretation we review de novo. See Morris v. Juneau County, 219 Wis. 2d 543, 550, 579 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5685 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
8 DISCUSSION ¶15 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. Duncan v. Asset Recovery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=388675 - 2021-07-13

[PDF] Michael S.E. v. Shawn B.S.
costs. At best, Michael could only have recovered postage, a de minimus sum which does not require
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5041 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of facts” constitutes a “new factor” is a question of law that we determine de novo. Harbor, 333 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=433136 - 2021-09-30

Holmen Concrete Products Company v. Hardy Construction Company, Inc.
or denial of a motion for summary judgment de novo. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Langridge, 2004 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7130 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
a party has standing is a question of law, which we review de novo. Chenequa Land Conservancy, 275 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62026 - 2014-09-15

Michael S.E. v. Shawn B.S.
that Michael had not incurred any allowable costs. At best, Michael could only have recovered postage, a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5760 - 2005-03-31

Frontsheet
as de minimus, his attorneys did not negotiate the check for an additional five months before
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87476 - 2012-09-24

[PDF] Walter Mills v. Vilas County Board of Adjustments
, which is a question of law we review de novo. See State ex rel. V.J.H. v. C.A.B., 163 Wis. 2d 833
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5690 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. The [postconviction] court must hold an evidentiary hearing if the defendant’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176103 - 2017-09-21