Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8421 - 8430 of 16410 for commentating.

COURT OF APPEALS
to reject probation in this case. The court then commented on the importance of the public-protection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41857 - 2009-10-05

State v. Anthony Kane
deal as illustrated by his comments to the author of the presentence investigation report that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15092 - 2005-03-31

State v. Kenneth E. Neu
that a biased jury was seated. In support of his argument, Neu states that “[t]here are commentators
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21750 - 2006-03-13

[PDF] CA Blank Order
began its sentencing comments by noting that the prosecutor had “accurately set forth the events
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=606061 - 2022-12-29

[PDF] CA Blank Order
No. 2019AP571-CRNM 5 to be associated with the judge’s comment that she did not usually accept
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246494 - 2019-09-06

[PDF] City of Beloit v. Daniel D. Bloom
. Also, nothing of record indicates that Bloom was not free to disregard Davis’s comments, tell Davis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15402 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
at 362. Nothing about the prosecutor’s comments “so infect[ed] the trial with unfairness as to make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94773 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
then commented on the importance of the public-protection objective, noting that individuals without money
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41857 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
that Schindler had no hand in creating the elevator specifications and was not asked to advise or comment upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50764 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] SC Clerk-Ltr
13-11D: In the Matter of the Amendment to the Comment to Supreme Court Rule 10.03(4) (b)(2
/sc/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=439770 - 2021-10-07