Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8421 - 8430 of 68502 for did.
Search results 8421 - 8430 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Steven J. Keizer
affirm. No. 94-2881-CR -2- At his jury trial, Keizer did not dispute that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8226 - 2017-09-19
affirm. No. 94-2881-CR -2- At his jury trial, Keizer did not dispute that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8226 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
City of Waupun v. Troy G. Hermans
2 § 346.63(1)(a) and (b), STATS. He contends that the police officers did not have probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13379 - 2017-09-21
2 § 346.63(1)(a) and (b), STATS. He contends that the police officers did not have probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13379 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Agripino Barbosa
to the trial court at sentencing, the trial court did not rely on the majority of the inaccurate information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3715 - 2017-09-19
to the trial court at sentencing, the trial court did not rely on the majority of the inaccurate information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3715 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
raised this claim previously—but asserted that he did so “inadequately.” ¶5 The postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108849 - 2014-03-10
raised this claim previously—but asserted that he did so “inadequately.” ¶5 The postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108849 - 2014-03-10
State v. Joseph Keepers
did not have a reasonable suspicion that he was committing or had committed a crime. The State argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2284 - 2005-03-31
did not have a reasonable suspicion that he was committing or had committed a crime. The State argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2284 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
did assert a state law claim in addition to his federal claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The defendants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31092 - 2007-12-05
did assert a state law claim in addition to his federal claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The defendants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31092 - 2007-12-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
previously—but asserted that he did so “inadequately.” ¶5 The postconviction court denied Miller’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108849 - 2017-09-21
previously—but asserted that he did so “inadequately.” ¶5 The postconviction court denied Miller’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108849 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
in Beard’s death. Perkins maintained that he did not fire the shot that killed Beard, but Perkins admitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40469 - 2014-09-15
in Beard’s death. Perkins maintained that he did not fire the shot that killed Beard, but Perkins admitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40469 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 23
, but did not receive signed copies back. After the work was completed, Great Lakes invoiced AMCON
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=348435 - 2021-05-10
, but did not receive signed copies back. After the work was completed, Great Lakes invoiced AMCON
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=348435 - 2021-05-10
COURT OF APPEALS
-Sleck testified Willett did not lend $20,000 to Marti’s Cuts and that the construction company was paid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36960 - 2009-06-29
-Sleck testified Willett did not lend $20,000 to Marti’s Cuts and that the construction company was paid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36960 - 2009-06-29