Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8421 - 8430 of 12879 for se.
Search results 8421 - 8430 of 12879 for se.
Jerry Saenz v. Gary McCaughtry
Institution, appeals pro se from an order affirming Warden McCaughtry’s decision that Saenz used intoxicants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13416 - 2005-03-31
Institution, appeals pro se from an order affirming Warden McCaughtry’s decision that Saenz used intoxicants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13416 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of proceeding pro se. The circuit court implicitly rejected Stelzer’s argument that he was not aware he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105971 - 2013-12-26
of proceeding pro se. The circuit court implicitly rejected Stelzer’s argument that he was not aware he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105971 - 2013-12-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
se, appeals the order of the circuit court denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus. Based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1037601 - 2025-11-18
se, appeals the order of the circuit court denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus. Based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1037601 - 2025-11-18
COURT OF APPEALS
. Thomas then filed, pro se, an appeal to this court, and we also affirmed. See State ex rel. Thomas v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33658 - 2008-08-05
. Thomas then filed, pro se, an appeal to this court, and we also affirmed. See State ex rel. Thomas v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33658 - 2008-08-05
802 LLC v. Don Kemp
, the plaintiff-respondent’s pro se brief addresses only the default judgment and makes no argument concerning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5502 - 2005-03-31
, the plaintiff-respondent’s pro se brief addresses only the default judgment and makes no argument concerning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5502 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and Kloppenburg, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Bruce Larson, pro se, appeals a divorce judgment. Bruce contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125405 - 2014-10-29
and Kloppenburg, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Bruce Larson, pro se, appeals a divorce judgment. Bruce contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125405 - 2014-10-29
COURT OF APPEALS
] Maurice Corbine, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion for reconsideration of an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107325 - 2014-01-22
] Maurice Corbine, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion for reconsideration of an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107325 - 2014-01-22
COURT OF APPEALS
, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Sheldon R. Scheel appeals pro se from an order denying his Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92069 - 2013-01-29
, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Sheldon R. Scheel appeals pro se from an order denying his Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92069 - 2013-01-29
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
successfully sought additional sentence credit, but his pro se motion for sentence modification was denied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=999093 - 2025-08-20
successfully sought additional sentence credit, but his pro se motion for sentence modification was denied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=999093 - 2025-08-20
Mark Hughes v. Stephen Puckett
. In his motion, Hughes asserted that he “is a pro se litigant, that is housed in an out of state facility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5313 - 2005-03-31
. In his motion, Hughes asserted that he “is a pro se litigant, that is housed in an out of state facility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5313 - 2005-03-31