Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8441 - 8450 of 29419 for er.
Search results 8441 - 8450 of 29419 for er.
[PDF]
State v. Diane R.
, August of 1990, and September of 1991.2 Diane R. claims that the trial court erred in not appointing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13597 - 2017-09-21
, August of 1990, and September of 1991.2 Diane R. claims that the trial court erred in not appointing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13597 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Bradley D. Muck
erred by denying his pretrial motion to exclude the results of a blood alcohol content test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6262 - 2017-09-19
erred by denying his pretrial motion to exclude the results of a blood alcohol content test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6262 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
erred when it denied his motion for a change of venue and when it rejected his challenge under Batson v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33065 - 2008-06-17
erred when it denied his motion for a change of venue and when it rejected his challenge under Batson v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33065 - 2008-06-17
Bernard G. Manske v. Royal Bank
that the trial court erred when it concluded that, as a matter of law, the Bank did not violate the terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13714 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court erred when it concluded that, as a matter of law, the Bank did not violate the terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13714 - 2005-03-31
Gerald O. v. Cindy R.
that the trial court erred by determining that the termination of Gerald's parental rights was in Michael's best
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10626 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court erred by determining that the termination of Gerald's parental rights was in Michael's best
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10626 - 2005-03-31
State v. Matthew H. Kiefer
followed the State’s sentencing recommendation. The trial court commented: [H]ere’s what I’ll do with you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26362 - 2006-09-05
followed the State’s sentencing recommendation. The trial court commented: [H]ere’s what I’ll do with you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26362 - 2006-09-05
COURT OF APPEALS
probation. This appeal follows. ¶8 On appeal, Alvarez first contends that the circuit court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132848 - 2015-01-13
probation. This appeal follows. ¶8 On appeal, Alvarez first contends that the circuit court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132848 - 2015-01-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the postconviction court erred. We note that there are some occasions in O’Grady’s brief in which he seeks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1014857 - 2025-09-25
that the postconviction court erred. We note that there are some occasions in O’Grady’s brief in which he seeks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1014857 - 2025-09-25
COURT OF APPEALS
contends that the circuit court erred in concluding that it lacked competence to extend the ten-day time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83708 - 2012-06-18
contends that the circuit court erred in concluding that it lacked competence to extend the ten-day time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83708 - 2012-06-18
[PDF]
Allan D. Schopper v. Sheriff Brad Gehring
by the Outagamie County Sheriff's Department on November 29, 1995. Schopper contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11488 - 2017-09-19
by the Outagamie County Sheriff's Department on November 29, 1995. Schopper contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11488 - 2017-09-19