Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8451 - 8460 of 29996 for consulta de causas.
Search results 8451 - 8460 of 29996 for consulta de causas.
State v. Donald Edward Weston
was deficient and prejudicial” de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d 121, 127‑28, 449 N.W.2d 845, 848 (1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10654 - 2005-03-31
was deficient and prejudicial” de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d 121, 127‑28, 449 N.W.2d 845, 848 (1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10654 - 2005-03-31
State v. Matthew D. Olson
of counsel presents a question of law. Thiel, 264 Wis. 2d 571, ¶21. This court reviews de novo the legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26488 - 2006-09-19
of counsel presents a question of law. Thiel, 264 Wis. 2d 571, ¶21. This court reviews de novo the legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26488 - 2006-09-19
David S. Ide v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
the facts, as found by LIRC, fulfill a particular legal standard is a question of law which we review de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17274 - 2005-03-31
the facts, as found by LIRC, fulfill a particular legal standard is a question of law which we review de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17274 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Pittman, 174 Wis. 2d 255, 276, 496 N.W.2d 74 (1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93091 - 2013-02-19
a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Pittman, 174 Wis. 2d 255, 276, 496 N.W.2d 74 (1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93091 - 2013-02-19
Town of Campbell v. City of La Crosse
precedence, a question of law that we review de novo. Town of Delavan v. City of Delavan, 176 Wis. 2d 516
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5205 - 2005-03-31
precedence, a question of law that we review de novo. Town of Delavan v. City of Delavan, 176 Wis. 2d 516
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5205 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, Robert and Mary urge this court to engage in a de novo standard of review to the court’s July 2021
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=676618 - 2023-07-06
, Robert and Mary urge this court to engage in a de novo standard of review to the court’s July 2021
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=676618 - 2023-07-06
COURT OF APPEALS
500. Whether a party has standing is a question of law, which we review de novo. Chenequa Land
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62026 - 2011-03-28
500. Whether a party has standing is a question of law, which we review de novo. Chenequa Land
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62026 - 2011-03-28
[PDF]
Daniel J. Knispel v. Northland Insurance Company
Northland Insurance on summary judgment. We perform summary judgment analysis de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19415 - 2017-09-21
Northland Insurance on summary judgment. We perform summary judgment analysis de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19415 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Leonard Collins v. Richard N. Polinske
by means of a new hearing; and the circuit court should not have treated the violation as de minimus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14314 - 2014-09-15
by means of a new hearing; and the circuit court should not have treated the violation as de minimus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14314 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. See Schmidt, 305 Wis. 2d 538, ¶24. ¶10 The Mirons concede
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164258 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law that we review de novo. See Schmidt, 305 Wis. 2d 538, ¶24. ¶10 The Mirons concede
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164258 - 2017-09-21