Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8451 - 8460 of 68466 for did.
Search results 8451 - 8460 of 68466 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
. Perkins maintained that he did not fire the shot that killed Beard, but Perkins admitted to his attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40469 - 2009-09-08
. Perkins maintained that he did not fire the shot that killed Beard, but Perkins admitted to his attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40469 - 2009-09-08
State v. Kraig V. Carter
. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its sentencing discretion, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20323 - 2008-08-13
. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its sentencing discretion, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20323 - 2008-08-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
previously—but asserted that he did so “inadequately.” ¶5 The postconviction court denied Miller’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108849 - 2017-09-21
previously—but asserted that he did so “inadequately.” ¶5 The postconviction court denied Miller’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108849 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
appointment to execute the new will. He did not explain his request to exclude Mark and Rick from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92824 - 2013-02-11
appointment to execute the new will. He did not explain his request to exclude Mark and Rick from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92824 - 2013-02-11
[PDF]
NOTICE
as defendants. However, Lacy did not name them as defendants in the caption of his complaint and the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31092 - 2014-09-15
as defendants. However, Lacy did not name them as defendants in the caption of his complaint and the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31092 - 2014-09-15
State v. Richard C. Plank
, 2003, the court accepted Plank’s no contest plea. At the plea hearing, the court did not personally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17796 - 2005-05-24
, 2003, the court accepted Plank’s no contest plea. At the plea hearing, the court did not personally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17796 - 2005-05-24
Brown County Department of Health & Human Services v. Kimberly A.M.
a confidential conversation with the judge. Kimberly’s trial counsel did not attend the interview. No record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4187 - 2005-03-31
a confidential conversation with the judge. Kimberly’s trial counsel did not attend the interview. No record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4187 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
did not file an appeal. 2 Welch had not yet pled guilty when Wold moved for separate trials. 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131995 - 2017-09-21
did not file an appeal. 2 Welch had not yet pled guilty when Wold moved for separate trials. 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131995 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
omnibus claims: (1) the circuit court did not “‘apply the law to the facts of the case’”; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101602 - 2017-09-21
omnibus claims: (1) the circuit court did not “‘apply the law to the facts of the case’”; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101602 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the victim on the top of her head with his “bare bottom.” The victim stated Zamora did things to her every
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199212 - 2017-10-31
the victim on the top of her head with his “bare bottom.” The victim stated Zamora did things to her every
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199212 - 2017-10-31