Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8471 - 8480 of 16410 for commentating.
Search results 8471 - 8480 of 16410 for commentating.
[PDF]
Harlan Richards v. Stephen Puckett
on life sentence. Committee notes the S.W. comments and Mr. Richards’ request for consideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13687 - 2014-09-15
on life sentence. Committee notes the S.W. comments and Mr. Richards’ request for consideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13687 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. However, the comments Little points to are not a reference to prior acts, but rather to “behavior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90168 - 2012-12-05
. However, the comments Little points to are not a reference to prior acts, but rather to “behavior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90168 - 2012-12-05
COURT OF APPEALS
the prosecutor commented on the other acts evidence introduced at the trial. The State introduced evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61888 - 2011-03-28
the prosecutor commented on the other acts evidence introduced at the trial. The State introduced evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61888 - 2011-03-28
State v. Robert R. Taylor
slip op. at ¶¶13, 16. We also held that the prosecutor’s isolated comment about the character
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5417 - 2005-03-31
slip op. at ¶¶13, 16. We also held that the prosecutor’s isolated comment about the character
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5417 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
report was correct. Moreover, the circuit court’s sentencing comments do not suggest that it relied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85130 - 2012-07-23
report was correct. Moreover, the circuit court’s sentencing comments do not suggest that it relied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85130 - 2012-07-23
COURT OF APPEALS
in an adversarial context. Indeed, the court’s comments suggest that the issues underlying the status of Nytsch’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82231 - 2012-05-15
in an adversarial context. Indeed, the court’s comments suggest that the issues underlying the status of Nytsch’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82231 - 2012-05-15
James B. Clark v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund
an expert opinion on causation.[4] The circuit court’s comment that Dr. Flatley had no opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17610 - 2013-09-12
an expert opinion on causation.[4] The circuit court’s comment that Dr. Flatley had no opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17610 - 2013-09-12
State v. Dionysus J. Thomas
not object to the prosecutor’s comments because he did not want to disturb the plea agreement, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20516 - 2005-12-06
not object to the prosecutor’s comments because he did not want to disturb the plea agreement, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20516 - 2005-12-06
State v. Eric J. Yelk
and commented on their collective seriousness and their impact on Yelk’s victims. It considered the character
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11854 - 2005-03-31
and commented on their collective seriousness and their impact on Yelk’s victims. It considered the character
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11854 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
is not mandatory. The MUTCD contains statements of law entitled “Standards,” which are mandatory, and comments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33086 - 2008-06-18
is not mandatory. The MUTCD contains statements of law entitled “Standards,” which are mandatory, and comments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33086 - 2008-06-18