Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8471 - 8480 of 30118 for consulta de causas.
Search results 8471 - 8480 of 30118 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
WI APP 155
at his own expense. ¶7 This is a question of statutory construction, which we review de novo. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55125 - 2014-09-15
at his own expense. ¶7 This is a question of statutory construction, which we review de novo. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55125 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
) (discussing the three levels of deference: “great weight deference, due weight deference and de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31749 - 2008-02-04
) (discussing the three levels of deference: “great weight deference, due weight deference and de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31749 - 2008-02-04
State v. Lashun T. McGee, Sr.
to de novo review. See id., 131 Wis. 2d at 283, 389 N.W.2d at 30. The trial court’s findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14664 - 2005-03-31
to de novo review. See id., 131 Wis. 2d at 283, 389 N.W.2d at 30. The trial court’s findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14664 - 2005-03-31
State v. Scott A. Rudoll
to a fair trial and therefore presents a question of law that we review de novo. Id. If in camera review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7183 - 2005-03-31
to a fair trial and therefore presents a question of law that we review de novo. Id. If in camera review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7183 - 2005-03-31
Russell K. Whitford v. Karen L. Whitford
), asking for a de novo review of the family court commissioner’s order. After a hearing, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15199 - 2005-03-31
), asking for a de novo review of the family court commissioner’s order. After a hearing, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15199 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Denise Currie v. State of Wisconsin Department of Industry
deference or de novo review. Id. at 284, 548 N.W.2d at 61. We will accord great weight deference only when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10967 - 2017-09-19
deference or de novo review. Id. at 284, 548 N.W.2d at 61. We will accord great weight deference only when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10967 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
agreement. Marks appeals. DISCUSSION ¶11 We review an order granting or denying summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44979 - 2014-09-15
agreement. Marks appeals. DISCUSSION ¶11 We review an order granting or denying summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44979 - 2014-09-15
2010 WI APP 158
and apply Wis. Stat. § 973.09(3)(a). Statutory interpretation is a question of law subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55773 - 2010-11-16
and apply Wis. Stat. § 973.09(3)(a). Statutory interpretation is a question of law subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55773 - 2010-11-16
[PDF]
NOTICE
a party has standing is a question of law, which we review de novo. Chenequa Land Conservancy, 275 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62026 - 2014-09-15
a party has standing is a question of law, which we review de novo. Chenequa Land Conservancy, 275 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62026 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a postconviction motion without an evidentiary hearing, we review de novo “whether the motion on its face alleges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=654482 - 2023-05-09
a postconviction motion without an evidentiary hearing, we review de novo “whether the motion on its face alleges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=654482 - 2023-05-09