Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8471 - 8480 of 63537 for records.

[PDF] NOTICE
as a 1 Although it is clear from the record that Davis pled no contest to armed robbery with threat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30845 - 2014-09-15

Jonas Doyle Carter v. Crystal Marie Carter
furniture, furnishings and personal items were disputed. The record demonstrates that at the end of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7442 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
(1975). He does not show that he did. Rather, the record reflects that federal officials advised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139830 - 2015-04-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
burden under the third Sullivan prong. Instead, the record adequately supports the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=961929 - 2025-05-28

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 24, 2012 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
either that the allegations were insufficient, or that the record conclusively showed the allegations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76950 - 2012-01-23

Jeff P. Brinckman v. Maura Brinckman Wehrenberg
. Brinckman to produce certain business and financial records, which she had subpoenaed. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12817 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
the specifics of these issues should refer to the records and briefs filed with the Supreme Court
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1047416 - 2025-12-04

[PDF] Microsoft Word - eFiling rule petition SUPPORTING MEMO Petition #14-03
to electronic circuit court records PETITION 14-03 The Committee of Chief Judges, a committee
/supreme/docs/1403petitionsupport.pdf - 2014-11-03

[PDF] Supreme Court rule petition 19-15 supporting memo appendix
..................................................................................................... 12 Making a Record
/supreme/docs/1915memoappendix.pdf - 2019-05-09

State v. Pablo Cruz Santana
was unduly harsh and excessive based on his minimal prior record, and the trial court misused its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12747 - 2005-03-31