Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8491 - 8500 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
Search results 8491 - 8500 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment is subject to this court’s de novo review. Olson v. Town of Cottage Grove, 2008 WI 51, ¶34
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244250 - 2019-08-08
judgment is subject to this court’s de novo review. Olson v. Town of Cottage Grove, 2008 WI 51, ¶34
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244250 - 2019-08-08
COURT OF APPEALS
the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that [appellate courts] review de novo. If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93970 - 2013-03-11
the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that [appellate courts] review de novo. If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93970 - 2013-03-11
2010 WI APP 158
and apply Wis. Stat. § 973.09(3)(a). Statutory interpretation is a question of law subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55773 - 2010-11-16
and apply Wis. Stat. § 973.09(3)(a). Statutory interpretation is a question of law subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55773 - 2010-11-16
James Adler v. D&H Industries, Inc.
of law that calls for our de novo review. See Kimps v. Hill, 200 Wis. 2d 1, 8, 546 N.W.2d 151 (1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7320 - 2005-03-31
of law that calls for our de novo review. See Kimps v. Hill, 200 Wis. 2d 1, 8, 546 N.W.2d 151 (1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7320 - 2005-03-31
State v. Christopher R. Hansen
, Stats., in relation to a given set of facts, however, is a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13108 - 2005-03-31
, Stats., in relation to a given set of facts, however, is a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13108 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 26, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of ...
under the certificate of public convenience and necessity. ¶6 We review de novo the grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64863 - 2011-05-25
under the certificate of public convenience and necessity. ¶6 We review de novo the grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64863 - 2011-05-25
[PDF]
Russell K. Whitford v. Karen L. Whitford
(6), asking for a de novo review of the family court commissioner’s order. After a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15199 - 2017-09-21
(6), asking for a de novo review of the family court commissioner’s order. After a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15199 - 2017-09-21
State v. Tony J. Gray
which this court reviews de novo. Id. ¶14 If a postconviction motion alleges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3233 - 2005-03-31
which this court reviews de novo. Id. ¶14 If a postconviction motion alleges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3233 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Discussion ¶10 “We review de novo a grant of summary judgment, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146338 - 2017-09-21
Discussion ¶10 “We review de novo a grant of summary judgment, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146338 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Donald R. Wield
presenting a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Campbell, 2002 WI App 20, ¶4, 250 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5584 - 2017-09-19
presenting a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Campbell, 2002 WI App 20, ¶4, 250 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5584 - 2017-09-19