Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8491 - 8500 of 68969 for had.
Search results 8491 - 8500 of 68969 for had.
State v. Major C. Latimer
was apprehended. The complaining witnesses identified Latimer as the person they had seen walk past them earlier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15782 - 2005-03-31
was apprehended. The complaining witnesses identified Latimer as the person they had seen walk past them earlier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15782 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jacob J.W.
, the juvenile probation officer who had conducted the investigation accompanying the petition. Following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7400 - 2005-03-31
, the juvenile probation officer who had conducted the investigation accompanying the petition. Following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7400 - 2005-03-31
City of Madison v. John P. Kavanaugh
the police officer had reasonable suspicion to stop the vehicle. We resolve this issue in favor of the City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9960 - 2005-03-31
the police officer had reasonable suspicion to stop the vehicle. We resolve this issue in favor of the City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9960 - 2005-03-31
County of Outagamie v. Kenneth C. Luedke
at trial that he had refused a chemical test of his blood after having previously dismissed the refusal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14092 - 2005-03-31
at trial that he had refused a chemical test of his blood after having previously dismissed the refusal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14092 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Madison v. John P. Kavanaugh
nonfinal order by order dated December 1, 1995. No. 95-3136 -2- officer had reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9960 - 2017-09-19
nonfinal order by order dated December 1, 1995. No. 95-3136 -2- officer had reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9960 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
in the vestibule. Leet testified that Buntrock told them that there was a person in his residence who had to go
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32983 - 2008-06-10
in the vestibule. Leet testified that Buntrock told them that there was a person in his residence who had to go
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32983 - 2008-06-10
[PDF]
Dale G. Latus v. James Johnson
to identify all damages he sustained, Latus responded “not applicable.” Although Johnson had asked Latus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12395 - 2017-09-21
to identify all damages he sustained, Latus responded “not applicable.” Although Johnson had asked Latus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12395 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
in his residence who had to go, and was refusing to leave. Buntrock gestured toward a man named Neff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32983 - 2014-09-15
in his residence who had to go, and was refusing to leave. Buntrock gestured toward a man named Neff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32983 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. voluntarily left the children with J.S. in May 2013 and had not visited or communicated with the children
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206419 - 2017-12-27
. voluntarily left the children with J.S. in May 2013 and had not visited or communicated with the children
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206419 - 2017-12-27
[PDF]
David J. Winkel v. Jeanette M. Wilke
addresses which Jeanette and Ronald had respectively recited in their answer and counterclaim. Thus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14219 - 2014-09-15
addresses which Jeanette and Ronald had respectively recited in their answer and counterclaim. Thus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14219 - 2014-09-15