Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8491 - 8500 of 57315 for id.
Search results 8491 - 8500 of 57315 for id.
[PDF]
State v. Bobby P.
decide without deference to the juvenile court's ruling. Id. at 282-83, 481 N.W.2d at 496
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8647 - 2017-09-19
decide without deference to the juvenile court's ruling. Id. at 282-83, 481 N.W.2d at 496
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8647 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State of Wisconsin ex rel., v. Township of Delavan
. 1990). If any one of these three prongs has been violated, sanctions must be imposed. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10786 - 2017-09-20
. 1990). If any one of these three prongs has been violated, sanctions must be imposed. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10786 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Melvin S. Lewis
was not functioning as the “counsel” guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment. Id. “Review of counsel’s performance gives
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2389 - 2017-09-19
was not functioning as the “counsel” guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment. Id. “Review of counsel’s performance gives
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2389 - 2017-09-19
Emil E. Jankee v. Clark County
as a matter of law. Id. In deciding if there are genuine issues of material fact, we are required to draw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9477 - 2005-03-31
as a matter of law. Id. In deciding if there are genuine issues of material fact, we are required to draw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9477 - 2005-03-31
State v. Marvin L. Anderson
behavior even though there is no probable cause to make an arrest,” id., 392 U.S. at 22, and that officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10560 - 2005-03-31
behavior even though there is no probable cause to make an arrest,” id., 392 U.S. at 22, and that officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10560 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a ‘new factor’ is a question of law.” Id., ¶33. We review questions of law independently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170285 - 2017-09-21
a ‘new factor’ is a question of law.” Id., ¶33. We review questions of law independently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170285 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
occurs when there has been a “serious flaw in the fundamental integrity of the plea.” Id. The court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141321 - 2015-05-04
occurs when there has been a “serious flaw in the fundamental integrity of the plea.” Id. The court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141321 - 2015-05-04
[PDF]
NOTICE
that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” Id., ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53420 - 2014-09-15
that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” Id., ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53420 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
not inform him that, under truth-in-sentencing, he is ineligible for parole or good-time credit. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27635 - 2014-09-15
not inform him that, under truth-in-sentencing, he is ineligible for parole or good-time credit. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27635 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 3, 2007 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of Ap...
not inform him that, under truth-in-sentencing, he is ineligible for parole or good-time credit. Id., ¶¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27635 - 2007-01-02
not inform him that, under truth-in-sentencing, he is ineligible for parole or good-time credit. Id., ¶¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27635 - 2007-01-02