Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 851 - 860 of 17421 for Cost.

Robert Miesen v. State of Wisconsin-Department of Transportation
the balance of appraisal costs he submitted to the DOT for payment under § 32.05(2)(b), Stats., which allows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14708 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
his mandamus action without awarding him costs and fees pursuant to No. 2020AP1455 2 WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=370546 - 2021-05-25

[PDF] Robert Miesen v. State of Wisconsin-Department of Transportation
of Transportation. Miesen sought the balance of appraisal costs he submitted to the DOT for payment under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14708 - 2017-09-21

Derek J. Harder v. Carol L. Pfitzinger
was entered the same day. The order dismissed all claims against all defendants with prejudice and with costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16796 - 2005-03-31

Frontsheet
is the appropriate sanction; and should Attorney Molinaro be required to pay the full costs of the proceeding
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36989 - 2009-06-30

[PDF] WI 61
is the appropriate sanction; and should Attorney Molinaro be required to pay the full costs of the proceeding
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36989 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Susan Shoemaker v. The Hearst Corporation
the circuit court did not err in awarding statutory costs to The Hearst Corporation. Accordingly, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3563 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Wisconsin Oven Corporation v. Mesa Industries, Inc.
2 denying Mesa costs after a mistrial and dismissal of two claims, and awarding WOC attorney’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15697 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
limitation on the City’s maximum liability for the project’s cost, and Vanden Elzen was legally obligated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173773 - 2017-09-21

Susan Shoemaker v. The Hearst Corporation
conclude the circuit court did not err in awarding statutory costs to The Hearst Corporation. Accordingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3563 - 2005-03-31