Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 851 - 860 of 17421 for Cost.

[PDF] Robert Miesen v. State of Wisconsin-Department of Transportation
of Transportation. Miesen sought the balance of appraisal costs he submitted to the DOT for payment under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14708 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
; request for double costs granted. Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Fine and Curley, JJ. ¶1 FINE, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28466 - 2014-09-15

Robert Miesen v. State of Wisconsin-Department of Transportation
the balance of appraisal costs he submitted to the DOT for payment under § 32.05(2)(b), Stats., which allows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14708 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 20, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
County: Patricia D. mcmahon, Judge. Affirmed; request for double costs granted. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28466 - 2010-08-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the amount of such pecuniary loss, together with costs, including a reasonable attorney’s fee.” See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110435 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
the amount of such pecuniary loss, together with costs, including a reasonable attorney’s fee.” See § 100.20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110435 - 2014-04-16

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
limitation on the City’s maximum liability for the project’s cost, and Vanden Elzen was legally obligated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173773 - 2017-09-21

Susan Shoemaker v. The Hearst Corporation
conclude the circuit court did not err in awarding statutory costs to The Hearst Corporation. Accordingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3563 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI 46
to professional misconduct for two years retroactive to January 3, 2005, and that Attorney Burke pay the costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28900 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Wisconsin Oven Corporation v. Mesa Industries, Inc.
2 denying Mesa costs after a mistrial and dismissal of two claims, and awarding WOC attorney’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15697 - 2017-09-21