Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 851 - 860 of 69198 for as he.
Search results 851 - 860 of 69198 for as he.
State v. James F.R., Jr.
assault of a child, contrary to § 948.02(1), Stats. He argues that his motion requesting the suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13517 - 2005-03-31
assault of a child, contrary to § 948.02(1), Stats. He argues that his motion requesting the suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13517 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. He argues the witness’s initial identification of him, which occurred during the preliminary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102152 - 2013-09-23
. He argues the witness’s initial identification of him, which occurred during the preliminary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102152 - 2013-09-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
testimony identifying Hollenbeck as the perpetrator. No. 2012AP2254-CR 2 He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102152 - 2017-09-21
testimony identifying Hollenbeck as the perpetrator. No. 2012AP2254-CR 2 He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102152 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. James F.R., Jr.
, contrary to § 948.02(1), STATS. He argues that his motion requesting the No. 98-0103 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13517 - 2017-09-21
, contrary to § 948.02(1), STATS. He argues that his motion requesting the No. 98-0103 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13517 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 974.06 (2009-10).[1] He also appeals from an order that denied his motion for reconsideration. His
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71746 - 2011-10-03
. § 974.06 (2009-10).[1] He also appeals from an order that denied his motion for reconsideration. His
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71746 - 2011-10-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
).1 He also appeals from an order that denied his motion for reconsideration. His claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71746 - 2014-09-15
).1 He also appeals from an order that denied his motion for reconsideration. His claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71746 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
. (2008-09).[1] He now appeals from the judgment of conviction. Booker’s postconviction/appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146852 - 2015-08-18
. (2008-09).[1] He now appeals from the judgment of conviction. Booker’s postconviction/appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146852 - 2015-08-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
)(cm)1g. (2008-09). 1 He now appeals from the judgment of conviction. Booker’s postconviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146852 - 2017-09-21
)(cm)1g. (2008-09). 1 He now appeals from the judgment of conviction. Booker’s postconviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146852 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of operating a vehicle while intoxicated, as a sixth offense. He argues that the circuit court should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145443 - 2017-09-21
of operating a vehicle while intoxicated, as a sixth offense. He argues that the circuit court should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145443 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of operating a vehicle while intoxicated, as a sixth offense. He argues that the circuit court should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145443 - 2015-08-03
of operating a vehicle while intoxicated, as a sixth offense. He argues that the circuit court should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145443 - 2015-08-03