Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 851 - 860 of 2641 for hill's.

COURT OF APPEALS
Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59 (1985). Svea offers no explanation for why he would have rejected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124663 - 2014-10-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, Svea would not have agreed to plead guilty and would have gone to trial. See Hill v. Lockhart, 474
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124663 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Wexford Village Homes Association, Inc. v. William Woehrle, Jr.
, residents of the Harvest Hill Addition to Wexford Village in Madison, Wisconsin, have parked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14352 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Susan K. Schey v. Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation
and operation. That analysis is flawed. In Kimps v. Hill, 200 Wis.2d 1, 24, 546 N.W.2d 151, 161 (1996), our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14778 - 2017-09-21

Kevin D. Nelson v. Karl Heichler
of the hill and when she reached the top of the hill, she saw Nelson lying face down in the pasture, injured
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7973 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
)); Hill v. La Crosse & M.R. Co., 14 Wis. 291, 293 (1861) (property held in custodia legis “cannot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182877 - 2017-09-21

Wexford Village Homes Association, Inc. v. William Woehrle, Jr.
relief. BACKGROUND William and Tracy Woehrle, residents of the Harvest Hill
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14352 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
insisted on going to trial.” Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59 (1985). Because a defendant must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39049 - 2014-09-15

State v. Daymon D. Tate
. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 311, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996); see Rock, 92 Wis. 2d at 558-59. In Hill v. Lockhart
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6148 - 2005-03-31

Susan K. Schey v. Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation
immunity exists is whether the act is discretionary or ministerial. See Kimps v. Hill, 200 Wis.2d 1, 10 n
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14778 - 2013-09-17