Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 851 - 860 of 15577 for probate.
Search results 851 - 860 of 15577 for probate.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
concluding there is no basis for challenging the sentences imposed after revocation of Chapman’s probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220359 - 2018-10-02
concluding there is no basis for challenging the sentences imposed after revocation of Chapman’s probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220359 - 2018-10-02
COURT OF APPEALS
three witnesses at the trial to the court. The first witness was Dave Kaczmarek, a probation and parole
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53769 - 2010-08-25
three witnesses at the trial to the court. The first witness was Dave Kaczmarek, a probation and parole
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53769 - 2010-08-25
COURT OF APPEALS
a decision of the Administrator of the Division of Hearings and Appeals that revoked Smith’s probation. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120143 - 2014-08-25
a decision of the Administrator of the Division of Hearings and Appeals that revoked Smith’s probation. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120143 - 2014-08-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the Administrator of the Division of Hearings and Appeals that revoked Smith’s probation. We reverse and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120143 - 2014-09-15
of the Administrator of the Division of Hearings and Appeals that revoked Smith’s probation. We reverse and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120143 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
was Dave Kaczmarek, a probation and parole agent for the State of Wisconsin. He testified as follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53769 - 2014-09-15
was Dave Kaczmarek, a probation and parole agent for the State of Wisconsin. He testified as follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53769 - 2014-09-15
State v. Eduardo Jose Trigueros
during a pat-down search. As we have seen, Trigueros pled guilty. Before sentencing, the probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17661 - 2005-07-06
during a pat-down search. As we have seen, Trigueros pled guilty. Before sentencing, the probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17661 - 2005-07-06
[PDF]
State v. Eduardo Jose Trigueros
, Trigueros pled guilty. Before sentencing, the probation department prepared a presentence-investigation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17661 - 2017-09-21
, Trigueros pled guilty. Before sentencing, the probation department prepared a presentence-investigation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17661 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Levi Hogner
imposed and stayed a one-year jail sentence and placed Hogner on probation for two years. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12321 - 2017-09-21
imposed and stayed a one-year jail sentence and placed Hogner on probation for two years. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12321 - 2017-09-21
State v. Levi Hogner
on probation for two years. The court ignored the minimum mandatory thirty-day jail sentence plainly required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12321 - 2005-03-31
on probation for two years. The court ignored the minimum mandatory thirty-day jail sentence plainly required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12321 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
also be free to argue on Count 4, but the State agreed to recommend probation on that count
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=486559 - 2022-02-23
also be free to argue on Count 4, but the State agreed to recommend probation on that count
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=486559 - 2022-02-23