Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8501 - 8510 of 64957 for b's.
Search results 8501 - 8510 of 64957 for b's.
[PDF]
NOTICE
. § 973.20(14)(b). As this court has stated, § 973.20(14)(b) “clearly allocates the burden of proof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34536 - 2014-09-15
. § 973.20(14)(b). As this court has stated, § 973.20(14)(b) “clearly allocates the burden of proof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34536 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jerry Means
him of three counts of felony bail jumping as a repeater in violation of §§ 946.49(1)(b) and 939.62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8250 - 2017-09-19
him of three counts of felony bail jumping as a repeater in violation of §§ 946.49(1)(b) and 939.62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8250 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
had the gun …. THE COURT: … [B]ut you’re telling me that you didn’t possess the gun itself
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162186 - 2017-09-21
had the gun …. THE COURT: … [B]ut you’re telling me that you didn’t possess the gun itself
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162186 - 2017-09-21
City of Oshkosh v. Terri L. Wirth
of a Class B misdemeanor. ¶8 Even a cursory review of the evidence demonstrates that Wirth’s conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21262 - 2006-02-07
of a Class B misdemeanor. ¶8 Even a cursory review of the evidence demonstrates that Wirth’s conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21262 - 2006-02-07
State v. Louis R.
)(b)1 & 961.41(1m)(cm), Stats. (a marijuana charge was dismissed). The petition also noted that Louis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13250 - 2005-03-31
)(b)1 & 961.41(1m)(cm), Stats. (a marijuana charge was dismissed). The petition also noted that Louis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13250 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
regulation[s]” as that term is defined in Wis. Stat. § 345.20(1)(b).[2] Accordingly, circuit courts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54236 - 2010-09-08
regulation[s]” as that term is defined in Wis. Stat. § 345.20(1)(b).[2] Accordingly, circuit courts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54236 - 2010-09-08
COURT OF APPEALS
Steven P. Hanson, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carter Smith, individually and d/b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66225 - 2011-06-20
Steven P. Hanson, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carter Smith, individually and d/b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66225 - 2011-06-20
[PDF]
State v. Archie F. Gill
). Tape recording a conversation when one party gives consent is lawful. See § 968.31(2)(b), STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12325 - 2017-09-21
). Tape recording a conversation when one party gives consent is lawful. See § 968.31(2)(b), STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12325 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Duerst
under § 973.05(4)(b), STATS. We consider each argument in turn. First, we disagree with appellant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14959 - 2017-09-21
under § 973.05(4)(b), STATS. We consider each argument in turn. First, we disagree with appellant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14959 - 2017-09-21
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Gricel S. Echavarria
of SCR 20:8.4(b).[2] The parties stipulated that Attorney Echavarria's misconduct was aggravated by her
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16826 - 2005-03-31
of SCR 20:8.4(b).[2] The parties stipulated that Attorney Echavarria's misconduct was aggravated by her
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16826 - 2005-03-31