Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8501 - 8510 of 12464 for mr.
Search results 8501 - 8510 of 12464 for mr.
COURT OF APPEALS
the trial court for not acknowledging that it was imposing the maximum sentence or “declar[ing] that Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98285 - 2013-06-24
the trial court for not acknowledging that it was imposing the maximum sentence or “declar[ing] that Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98285 - 2013-06-24
CA Blank Order
that Mr. Smith is not a United States citizen.” [4] The PSI report referred to the “COMPAS actuarial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132312 - 2014-12-25
that Mr. Smith is not a United States citizen.” [4] The PSI report referred to the “COMPAS actuarial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132312 - 2014-12-25
[PDF]
NOTICE
the headlock is the following testimony by Lien: Q. All right. Did you hit Mr. Heindl? A. Yes, I did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50428 - 2014-09-15
the headlock is the following testimony by Lien: Q. All right. Did you hit Mr. Heindl? A. Yes, I did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50428 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
this was “effectively Mr. Broadnax’s lifetime.” ¶4 Just days after sentencing, Broadnax filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98448 - 2013-06-24
this was “effectively Mr. Broadnax’s lifetime.” ¶4 Just days after sentencing, Broadnax filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98448 - 2013-06-24
Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance Company v. Bor-Mor, Inc.
not the case. The parties are not just Case [Bor-Mor] and Dr. Karban. Mr. Ratzel doesn’t represent Dr. Karban
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6686 - 2005-03-31
not the case. The parties are not just Case [Bor-Mor] and Dr. Karban. Mr. Ratzel doesn’t represent Dr. Karban
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6686 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
maybe there was a struggle, I was hoping during that struggle, Mr. Reavers would have secured some
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=521700 - 2022-05-18
maybe there was a struggle, I was hoping during that struggle, Mr. Reavers would have secured some
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=521700 - 2022-05-18
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Virjean L.
asked Mr. [T.] the question on how many times he has been convicted of a crime. … It was that type
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26560 - 2006-09-25
asked Mr. [T.] the question on how many times he has been convicted of a crime. … It was that type
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26560 - 2006-09-25
William Ellingsworth v. Frederick Swiggum
that there was testimony that Mr. Swiggum and the Swiggums' predecessor in title, Vincent Wojtech, did some maintenance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7954 - 2005-03-31
that there was testimony that Mr. Swiggum and the Swiggums' predecessor in title, Vincent Wojtech, did some maintenance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7954 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frederick T. West v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
that “[t]he Commission's main reason for finding that Mr. West had not sustained his burden of proof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9712 - 2017-09-19
that “[t]he Commission's main reason for finding that Mr. West had not sustained his burden of proof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9712 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
police officers conducting the investigation.” ¶11 The trial court recounted that: Mr. Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47247 - 2014-09-15
police officers conducting the investigation.” ¶11 The trial court recounted that: Mr. Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47247 - 2014-09-15