Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8501 - 8510 of 59024 for quit claim deed.
Search results 8501 - 8510 of 59024 for quit claim deed.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Wilder’s claims and summarily affirm. The State charged Wilder in an amended information with first
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502779 - 2022-04-05
Wilder’s claims and summarily affirm. The State charged Wilder in an amended information with first
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502779 - 2022-04-05
COURT OF APPEALS
on the ground that his claims are procedurally barred. He also appeals the order that denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121638 - 2014-09-15
on the ground that his claims are procedurally barred. He also appeals the order that denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121638 - 2014-09-15
Lloyd Stunkel v. Price Electric Cooperative
Stunkel appeal a judgment dismissing their claim against Price Electric Cooperative and Federated Rural
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14545 - 2005-03-31
Stunkel appeal a judgment dismissing their claim against Price Electric Cooperative and Federated Rural
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14545 - 2005-03-31
Mary A. Cruz v. All Saints Healthcare System, Inc.
., appeals from a judgment dismissing its cross-claims against the respondent, Midwest Medical Records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6399 - 2005-03-31
., appeals from a judgment dismissing its cross-claims against the respondent, Midwest Medical Records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6399 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Lloyd Stunkel v. Price Electric Cooperative
. Lloyd and Lorraine Stunkel appeal a judgment dismissing their claim against Price Electric Cooperative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14545 - 2017-09-21
. Lloyd and Lorraine Stunkel appeal a judgment dismissing their claim against Price Electric Cooperative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14545 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for a writ of habeas corpus on the ground that his claims are procedurally barred. He also appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121638 - 2014-09-16
for a writ of habeas corpus on the ground that his claims are procedurally barred. He also appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121638 - 2014-09-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that Grady’s claims are barred, and for the reasons set forth below, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Grady
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=607977 - 2023-01-10
that Grady’s claims are barred, and for the reasons set forth below, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Grady
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=607977 - 2023-01-10
[PDF]
NOTICE
. The court then construed the ineffective-assistance claims as alleging ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60037 - 2014-09-15
. The court then construed the ineffective-assistance claims as alleging ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60037 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
(2009-10).[1] Because Adell’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is procedurally barred and his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70527 - 2011-09-06
(2009-10).[1] Because Adell’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is procedurally barred and his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70527 - 2011-09-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against Kelly S. Kincaid. Based upon our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=943969 - 2025-04-22
order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against Kelly S. Kincaid. Based upon our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=943969 - 2025-04-22