Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8501 - 8510 of 83389 for simple case search.
Search results 8501 - 8510 of 83389 for simple case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
in the interest of justice. We disagree and affirm. Background A. Nature of the Case ¶2 James
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108906 - 2014-03-10
in the interest of justice. We disagree and affirm. Background A. Nature of the Case ¶2 James
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108906 - 2014-03-10
[PDF]
State v. Christopher A. Knapp
surveillance. Other officers were attempting to obtain a search warrant for the property. The officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8162 - 2017-09-19
surveillance. Other officers were attempting to obtain a search warrant for the property. The officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8162 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Frank Miles
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-1364-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12468 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-1364-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12468 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Brief of Amicus Curiae (Lisa Hunter et al.)
, Ste 201 Madison, Wisconsin 53703-3095 608.663.7460 CCurtis@perkinscoie.com Case 2021AP001450
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/briefamicuscuriaehunter.pdf - 2021-10-18
, Ste 201 Madison, Wisconsin 53703-3095 608.663.7460 CCurtis@perkinscoie.com Case 2021AP001450
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/briefamicuscuriaehunter.pdf - 2021-10-18
State v. Frank Miles
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-1364-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12468 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-1364-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12468 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, was remand the case for further proceedings. We agree with Stewart that the Commission acted outside its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114651 - 2017-09-21
, was remand the case for further proceedings. We agree with Stewart that the Commission acted outside its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114651 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, despite clear language to the contrary, was remand the case for further proceedings. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114651 - 2014-06-16
, despite clear language to the contrary, was remand the case for further proceedings. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114651 - 2014-06-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
complaint in the instant case, Van Dreel previously owned the entirety of a forty-acre property termed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=712842 - 2023-10-11
complaint in the instant case, Van Dreel previously owned the entirety of a forty-acre property termed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=712842 - 2023-10-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and No. 2021AP53-CR 2 record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=467337 - 2021-12-28
and No. 2021AP53-CR 2 record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=467337 - 2021-12-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
the investigative stop, thus the subsequent search was invalid. We disagree and affirm. ¶2 According
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33777 - 2014-09-15
the investigative stop, thus the subsequent search was invalid. We disagree and affirm. ¶2 According
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33777 - 2014-09-15