Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8501 - 8510 of 55954 for so.
Search results 8501 - 8510 of 55954 for so.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
inmate’s behalf, but maintained that he never requested or received any payment for doing so. Mueller
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90908 - 2014-09-15
inmate’s behalf, but maintained that he never requested or received any payment for doing so. Mueller
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90908 - 2014-09-15
Shane C. Reinhart v. Peggy S. Reinhart
they went to Peggy’s home so they would not be hungry when Peggy put supper on the table. Shane not only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16179 - 2005-03-31
they went to Peggy’s home so they would not be hungry when Peggy put supper on the table. Shane not only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16179 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeremy M. Wine
it, I will continue this matter a couple of days so that [the person who prepared the PSI] can contact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14041 - 2005-03-31
it, I will continue this matter a couple of days so that [the person who prepared the PSI] can contact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14041 - 2005-03-31
Town of Harmony v. Donald T. Donahue and Stephen R. Donahue
for a fine authorized by statute, the fine imposed must be so excessive and unusual, and so disproportionate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2401 - 2005-03-31
for a fine authorized by statute, the fine imposed must be so excessive and unusual, and so disproportionate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2401 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gary L. Klotz
only if doing so is necessary to correct a manifest injustice. State v. Booth, 142 Wis. 2d 232, 235
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4882 - 2005-03-31
only if doing so is necessary to correct a manifest injustice. State v. Booth, 142 Wis. 2d 232, 235
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4882 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was afforded an opportunity to address the court personally and did so prior to pronouncement of his sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144577 - 2017-09-21
was afforded an opportunity to address the court personally and did so prior to pronouncement of his sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144577 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
.[2] So, today, I am going to give you credit, Mr. Sparks, for what you’ve done, and I
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823763 - 2024-07-10
.[2] So, today, I am going to give you credit, Mr. Sparks, for what you’ve done, and I
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823763 - 2024-07-10
State v. Latasha J.
requested counsel; the court adjourned the hearing and referred her to the state public defender’s office so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6060 - 2005-03-31
requested counsel; the court adjourned the hearing and referred her to the state public defender’s office so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6060 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Lori Trost v. Keith D. Trost
during the day when Alice was in school. The trial court continued: So we’re starting all over again
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15502 - 2017-09-21
during the day when Alice was in school. The trial court continued: So we’re starting all over again
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15502 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
The court concluded its explanation by explicitly incorporating the State’s arguments: “So all in all, I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66183 - 2011-06-22
The court concluded its explanation by explicitly incorporating the State’s arguments: “So all in all, I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66183 - 2011-06-22