Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8511 - 8520 of 64716 for b's.
Search results 8511 - 8520 of 64716 for b's.
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Duerst
under § 973.05(4)(b), STATS. We consider each argument in turn. First, we disagree with appellant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14958 - 2017-09-21
under § 973.05(4)(b), STATS. We consider each argument in turn. First, we disagree with appellant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14958 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. § 806.07. He first relied on § 806.07(1)(b), contending “newly discovered evidence” conclusively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34183 - 2014-09-15
. § 806.07. He first relied on § 806.07(1)(b), contending “newly discovered evidence” conclusively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34183 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Duerst
under § 973.05(4)(b), STATS. We consider each argument in turn. First, we disagree with appellant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14959 - 2017-09-21
under § 973.05(4)(b), STATS. We consider each argument in turn. First, we disagree with appellant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14959 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Grand Chute Auto Sales, Inc. v. David W. Lehman
. DAVID W. LEHMAN, DEFENDANT, JOHN LONG D/B/A JOHN’S TOWING & RECOVERY, DEFENDANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3786 - 2017-09-20
. DAVID W. LEHMAN, DEFENDANT, JOHN LONG D/B/A JOHN’S TOWING & RECOVERY, DEFENDANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3786 - 2017-09-20
State v. Louis R.
)(b)1 & 961.41(1m)(cm), Stats. (a marijuana charge was dismissed). The petition also noted that Louis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13250 - 2013-12-18
)(b)1 & 961.41(1m)(cm), Stats. (a marijuana charge was dismissed). The petition also noted that Louis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13250 - 2013-12-18
City of Oshkosh v. Terri L. Wirth
of a Class B misdemeanor. ¶8 Even a cursory review of the evidence demonstrates that Wirth’s conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21262 - 2006-02-07
of a Class B misdemeanor. ¶8 Even a cursory review of the evidence demonstrates that Wirth’s conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21262 - 2006-02-07
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 17, 2007 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
II City of New Berlin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Jeremy B. Olsen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27750 - 2007-01-16
II City of New Berlin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Jeremy B. Olsen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27750 - 2007-01-16
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 806.07. He first relied on § 806.07(1)(b), contending “newly discovered evidence” conclusively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34183 - 2008-09-29
. § 806.07. He first relied on § 806.07(1)(b), contending “newly discovered evidence” conclusively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34183 - 2008-09-29
COURT OF APPEALS
.] § 757.69(1)(b), a preliminary hearing may be conducted by a court commissioner.” State v. Gillespie, 2005
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32320 - 2008-04-07
.] § 757.69(1)(b), a preliminary hearing may be conducted by a court commissioner.” State v. Gillespie, 2005
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32320 - 2008-04-07
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Gricel S. Echavarria
of SCR 20:8.4(b).[2] The parties stipulated that Attorney Echavarria's misconduct was aggravated by her
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16826 - 2005-03-31
of SCR 20:8.4(b).[2] The parties stipulated that Attorney Echavarria's misconduct was aggravated by her
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16826 - 2005-03-31