Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8511 - 8520 of 59782 for quit claim deed/1000.

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Response of Intervenors-Respondents Johnson et al. to Consultants' Report
to Consider Such Claims, Without Affording Any Discovery, Fact-Finding, Trial, or Meaningful Opportunity
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0208intervenorresponse.pdf - 2024-02-08

[PDF] Megal Development Corporation v. Craig Shadof
a small claims judgment for eviction and money damages against the Shadofs in the amount of $52,713.78
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20196 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Rule petitioin 20-03 Amended Comments of 1,932 Individuals compiled by the Fair Maps Coalition, as submitted by Holly Bland, Deputy Director, Fair Elections Project
of this rule because the petitioners do not address the problem that they claim to address. They claim
/supreme/docs/2003commentsblandamend.pdf - 2020-12-23

[PDF] The Third Branch - summer 2012
. “With the recent implementation of eFiling for civil, small claims and family cases, the timing was perfect
/news/thirdbranch/docs/summer12.pdf - 2012-09-21

[PDF] State v. Derryle S. McDowell
that “it is a prerequisite to a claim of ineffective representation … to preserve the testimony of trial counsel.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5223 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Gary M. B.
as to the convictions in the 1970's since it has been –'73, '75, and '77—since it has been quite some time since
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16578 - 2017-09-21

State v. Derryle S. McDowell
were quite clear: A: So then we talked about, well, if you testify in light of what you’re saying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5223 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Supreme Court Rule petition 13-15
of approximately 100 e. General civil court - not specialized into AFamily,@ ALarge Claims,@ AJuvenile,@ etc
/supreme/docs/1315petition.pdf - 2013-09-30

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
it inconsequential to our decision because it was totally unexplained. The notice is quite clear that the basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214487 - 2018-06-19

State v. Ricardo Ruiz
. . . with the federal and other courts." Hoyer, 180 Wis. at 415. The court's use of the word "elect" is quite at odds
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17317 - 2005-03-31