Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8521 - 8530 of 30128 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] WI APP 18
receive a de novo trial on an excessive assessment claim. Hermann v. Town of Delavan, 215 Wis. 2d 370
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106587 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] National Safety Associates, Inc. v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
impression. We therefore review the issue de novo. See Kelley Co., 172 Wis.2d at 245, 493 N.W.2d at 73 (de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8923 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Michael P. Norks v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
we review de novo by applying the same standards employed by the trial court. Brownelli v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8929 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of law for de novo review. See id. No. 2013AP93 6 ¶14 We conclude that Starks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122463 - 2014-09-25

State v. Bradley J. Vorburger
has occurred based on a given set of facts is a question of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2480 - 2005-03-31

Bruce D. Golembiewski v. City of Milwaukee
based on the evidence,” State ex rel. Smits v. City of De Pere, 104 Wis.2d 26, 31, 310 N.W.2d 607, 609
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14380 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
agreement. Marks appeals. DISCUSSION ¶11 We review an order granting or denying summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44979 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Kenneth W. Grothmann
will review de novo the trial court’s application of constitutional principles to those facts. Id. ¶18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19378 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. ¶10 A claim of ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149536 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Donald R. Wield
presenting a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Campbell, 2002 WI App 20, ¶4, 250 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5584 - 2017-09-19