Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8521 - 8530 of 12423 for mr.
Search results 8521 - 8530 of 12423 for mr.
State v. Curtis E. Dittberner
it. Mr. Dittberner stated he understood the form, but stated he still refused to submit to the test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3291 - 2005-03-31
it. Mr. Dittberner stated he understood the form, but stated he still refused to submit to the test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3291 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
concession that a cognizable seizure occurred before Mr. Hudson admitted to criminal wrongdoing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=894279 - 2024-12-26
concession that a cognizable seizure occurred before Mr. Hudson admitted to criminal wrongdoing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=894279 - 2024-12-26
COURT OF APPEALS
, Jim’s advocacy counsel stated that he appeared with “Mr. [B.].” The transcript face page also indicates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60886 - 2011-03-15
, Jim’s advocacy counsel stated that he appeared with “Mr. [B.].” The transcript face page also indicates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60886 - 2011-03-15
COURT OF APPEALS
utilized at the preliminary examination.” He also contends that the $6,800 “amount proffered by Mr. Haiduk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70213 - 2011-08-29
utilized at the preliminary examination.” He also contends that the $6,800 “amount proffered by Mr. Haiduk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70213 - 2011-08-29
[PDF]
State v. Ernest L. Smith
on this conclusion, the trial court granted Smith's motion to dismiss the criminal complaint and ordered that "Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11138 - 2017-09-19
on this conclusion, the trial court granted Smith's motion to dismiss the criminal complaint and ordered that "Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11138 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and the relevance of that question was that there’s an inference arising from it that Mr. Dresel would have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190535 - 2017-09-21
and the relevance of that question was that there’s an inference arising from it that Mr. Dresel would have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190535 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. David William Newbury
.... This was a severe and savage and brutal homicide that Mr. Newbury had the choice not to participate in, had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8719 - 2017-09-19
.... This was a severe and savage and brutal homicide that Mr. Newbury had the choice not to participate in, had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8719 - 2017-09-19
Penny M. Z. v. John D. R.
is handling this case. We just got wind of this this morning at about 10:00 o’clock, and Mr. Heiber
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12169 - 2005-03-31
is handling this case. We just got wind of this this morning at about 10:00 o’clock, and Mr. Heiber
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12169 - 2005-03-31
Micah Oriedo v. Wisconsin Personnel Commission
for its action, and that the reason was not pretextual, are reasonable. Wis. Admin. Code § ER-MRS 30.01(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4059 - 2005-03-31
for its action, and that the reason was not pretextual, are reasonable. Wis. Admin. Code § ER-MRS 30.01(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4059 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Andre Derrick Wingo
open court to waiver of a trial by jury. Mr. Livingston was present in the courtroom at the time his
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17460 - 2017-09-21
open court to waiver of a trial by jury. Mr. Livingston was present in the courtroom at the time his
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17460 - 2017-09-21