Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8541 - 8550 of 83269 for case search.
Search results 8541 - 8550 of 83269 for case search.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
significant dental and health expenses. ¶8 The case was tried to a jury. Dr. Gatzke admitted that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240152 - 2019-05-02
significant dental and health expenses. ¶8 The case was tried to a jury. Dr. Gatzke admitted that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240152 - 2019-05-02
[PDF]
State v. Joseph D. Haas
lot was not a search or seizure and did not affect a privacy interest. ¶4 On appeal, Haas argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15952 - 2017-09-21
lot was not a search or seizure and did not affect a privacy interest. ¶4 On appeal, Haas argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15952 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
a search warrant at the apartment. The police found Omot, Schroedl, and a woman in the bedroom Omot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58135 - 2010-12-22
a search warrant at the apartment. The police found Omot, Schroedl, and a woman in the bedroom Omot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58135 - 2010-12-22
State v. Joseph D. Haas
was not a search or seizure and did not affect a privacy interest. ¶4 On appeal, Haas argues that attaching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15952 - 2005-03-31
was not a search or seizure and did not affect a privacy interest. ¶4 On appeal, Haas argues that attaching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15952 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
, the police executed a search warrant at the apartment. The police found Omot, Schroedl, and a woman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58135 - 2014-09-15
, the police executed a search warrant at the apartment. The police found Omot, Schroedl, and a woman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58135 - 2014-09-15
State v. Joseph D. Haas
was not a search or seizure and did not affect a privacy interest. ¶4 On appeal, Haas argues that attaching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15955 - 2005-03-31
was not a search or seizure and did not affect a privacy interest. ¶4 On appeal, Haas argues that attaching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15955 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph D. Haas
was not a search or seizure and did not affect a privacy interest. ¶4 On appeal, Haas argues that attaching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15956 - 2005-03-31
was not a search or seizure and did not affect a privacy interest. ¶4 On appeal, Haas argues that attaching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15956 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Joseph D. Haas
lot was not a search or seizure and did not affect a privacy interest. ¶4 On appeal, Haas argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15956 - 2017-09-21
lot was not a search or seizure and did not affect a privacy interest. ¶4 On appeal, Haas argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15956 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Joseph D. Haas
lot was not a search or seizure and did not affect a privacy interest. ¶4 On appeal, Haas argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15954 - 2017-09-21
lot was not a search or seizure and did not affect a privacy interest. ¶4 On appeal, Haas argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15954 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Joseph D. Haas
lot was not a search or seizure and did not affect a privacy interest. ¶4 On appeal, Haas argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15953 - 2017-09-21
lot was not a search or seizure and did not affect a privacy interest. ¶4 On appeal, Haas argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15953 - 2017-09-21