Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8541 - 8550 of 40258 for probate forms/1000.
Search results 8541 - 8550 of 40258 for probate forms/1000.
State v. Robert Garel
to vacate a prior order placing him on probation, claiming this could not be done because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11821 - 2005-03-31
to vacate a prior order placing him on probation, claiming this could not be done because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11821 - 2005-03-31
State v. Clarence E. Pelton
, contrary to § 946.49(1)(b), Stats. He was placed on two concurrent terms of probation. After his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11795 - 2005-03-31
, contrary to § 946.49(1)(b), Stats. He was placed on two concurrent terms of probation. After his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11795 - 2005-03-31
State v. Clarence E. Pelton
, contrary to § 946.49(1)(b), Stats. He was placed on two concurrent terms of probation. After his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11796 - 2005-03-31
, contrary to § 946.49(1)(b), Stats. He was placed on two concurrent terms of probation. After his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11796 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
after the revocation of his probation. His appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798393 - 2024-05-08
after the revocation of his probation. His appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798393 - 2024-05-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to challenge the sentences imposed following revocation of his probation. Wilber was advised of his right
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142724 - 2017-09-21
to challenge the sentences imposed following revocation of his probation. Wilber was advised of his right
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142724 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of probation. The circuit court accepted Witkowski’s plea and followed the parties’ joint recommendation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261532 - 2020-05-21
of probation. The circuit court accepted Witkowski’s plea and followed the parties’ joint recommendation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261532 - 2020-05-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
after the revocation of his probation. His appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798393 - 2024-05-08
after the revocation of his probation. His appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798393 - 2024-05-08
[PDF]
State v. Lloyd V. Pelly
on probation. We conclude that he is not entitled to the credit, and therefore reverse. No(s). 98-3137
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14728 - 2017-09-21
on probation. We conclude that he is not entitled to the credit, and therefore reverse. No(s). 98-3137
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14728 - 2017-09-21
State v. Lloyd V. Pelly
served while electronically monitored on probation. We conclude that he is not entitled to the credit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14728 - 2005-03-31
served while electronically monitored on probation. We conclude that he is not entitled to the credit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14728 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI 6
, the circuit court sentenced Attorney Mirza to 12 months of jail, stayed for three years of probation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=921558 - 2025-04-11
, the circuit court sentenced Attorney Mirza to 12 months of jail, stayed for three years of probation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=921558 - 2025-04-11