Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8541 - 8550 of 75042 for public records.
Search results 8541 - 8550 of 75042 for public records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698671 - 2023-09-06
a response. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698671 - 2023-09-06
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91814 - 2014-09-15
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91814 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
the entire record and the no-merit report, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977244 - 2025-07-02
the entire record and the no-merit report, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977244 - 2025-07-02
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
a response. He has not done so. Upon reviewing the entire Record and the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977228 - 2025-07-02
a response. He has not done so. Upon reviewing the entire Record and the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977228 - 2025-07-02
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
the entire record and the no-merit report, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977244 - 2025-07-02
the entire record and the no-merit report, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977244 - 2025-07-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=974140 - 2025-06-24
2 consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=974140 - 2025-06-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sentencing discretion by predetermining his sentence. Based on our review of the briefs and the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=569114 - 2022-09-22
sentencing discretion by predetermining his sentence. Based on our review of the briefs and the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=569114 - 2022-09-22
[PDF]
State v. Michael R. Delao
. DeLao received ninety days of credit against this sentence. The state public defender appointed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9159 - 2017-09-19
. DeLao received ninety days of credit against this sentence. The state public defender appointed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9159 - 2017-09-19
State v. Billy J. Rachal
these mitigating factors. The court instead focused on Billy’s record of several criminal convictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3029 - 2005-03-31
these mitigating factors. The court instead focused on Billy’s record of several criminal convictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3029 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
] and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Dorton filed a response. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131575 - 2014-12-16
] and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Dorton filed a response. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131575 - 2014-12-16