Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8541 - 8550 of 63904 for records.
Search results 8541 - 8550 of 63904 for records.
COURT OF APPEALS
recorded by the jail. In June 2013, the State provided trial counsel and the trial court with information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142699 - 2015-06-01
recorded by the jail. In June 2013, the State provided trial counsel and the trial court with information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142699 - 2015-06-01
[PDF]
NOTICE
on grounds that record evidence established the Town of Norway’s legitimate land No. 2007AP231 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31988 - 2014-09-15
on grounds that record evidence established the Town of Norway’s legitimate land No. 2007AP231 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31988 - 2014-09-15
State v. Demitrius Goodlow
robbery, party to a crime; because the evidence in the record did not support the submission of lesser
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14910 - 2005-03-31
robbery, party to a crime; because the evidence in the record did not support the submission of lesser
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14910 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 136
on evidence that was not part of the record at the suppression hearing.”). However, State v. Gaines, 197 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33680 - 2014-09-15
on evidence that was not part of the record at the suppression hearing.”). However, State v. Gaines, 197 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33680 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
. The court of appeals determined that the reconfinement hearing was defective because nothing in the record
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32589 - 2008-04-30
. The court of appeals determined that the reconfinement hearing was defective because nothing in the record
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32589 - 2008-04-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is not supported by the record, and that the court should have required him to have counsel to represent him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1102094 - 2026-04-09
is not supported by the record, and that the court should have required him to have counsel to represent him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1102094 - 2026-04-09
Mary Anne Hedrich v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
must deliver to the faculty member a copy of the decision report, a copy of the record of the first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2843 - 2005-03-31
must deliver to the faculty member a copy of the decision report, a copy of the record of the first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2843 - 2005-03-31
State v. Pablo Cruz Santana
was unduly harsh and excessive based on his minimal prior record, and the trial court misused its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12747 - 2005-03-31
was unduly harsh and excessive based on his minimal prior record, and the trial court misused its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12747 - 2005-03-31
State v. Marquis O. Gilliam
a hearing problem. But I think that, based on the record that’s been made, there is a basis for striking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15512 - 2005-03-31
a hearing problem. But I think that, based on the record that’s been made, there is a basis for striking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15512 - 2005-03-31
Donivan Molitor v. Rusk County Board of Adjustment
review the record as augmented by the second board hearing. See Lakeshore Dev. Corp. v. Plan Comm’n, 12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3053 - 2005-03-31
review the record as augmented by the second board hearing. See Lakeshore Dev. Corp. v. Plan Comm’n, 12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3053 - 2005-03-31