Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8551 - 8560 of 63511 for records.
Search results 8551 - 8560 of 63511 for records.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as stated on the record at the plea hearing. Attorney Zilles also deviated from the joint sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=586118 - 2022-11-03
as stated on the record at the plea hearing. Attorney Zilles also deviated from the joint sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=586118 - 2022-11-03
Kevin J. Pok v. David E. McCauley
stated that a search of town records had failed to show that an ordinance had been adopted making
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8318 - 2005-03-31
stated that a search of town records had failed to show that an ordinance had been adopted making
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8318 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on the same date. The record does not reflect why the case was dismissed. ¶6 Stair moved for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=668913 - 2023-06-20
on the same date. The record does not reflect why the case was dismissed. ¶6 Stair moved for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=668913 - 2023-06-20
[PDF]
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Pamela E.P.
98-0500 4 conclude that Pamela’s first claim is not supported by the appellate record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13655 - 2017-09-21
98-0500 4 conclude that Pamela’s first claim is not supported by the appellate record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13655 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Pamela E.P.
98-0500 4 conclude that Pamela’s first claim is not supported by the appellate record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13656 - 2017-09-21
98-0500 4 conclude that Pamela’s first claim is not supported by the appellate record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13656 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. David S. Frederick
was unsupported by the record. He contends that appellate counsel discussed two other pending cases with him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13795 - 2014-09-15
was unsupported by the record. He contends that appellate counsel discussed two other pending cases with him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13795 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93382 - 2014-09-15
, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93382 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, the parties have submitted memo briefs. Upon review of those memoranda and the record, we affirm the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61910 - 2011-03-29
, the parties have submitted memo briefs. Upon review of those memoranda and the record, we affirm the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61910 - 2011-03-29
[PDF]
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Pamela E.P.
98-0500 4 conclude that Pamela’s first claim is not supported by the appellate record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13654 - 2017-09-21
98-0500 4 conclude that Pamela’s first claim is not supported by the appellate record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13654 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a sentence on appeal if from the facts of record [the sentence] is sustainable as a proper discretionary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90711 - 2014-09-15
a sentence on appeal if from the facts of record [the sentence] is sustainable as a proper discretionary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90711 - 2014-09-15