Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8551 - 8560 of 63904 for records.
Search results 8551 - 8560 of 63904 for records.
State v. Pablo Cruz Santana
was unduly harsh and excessive based on his minimal prior record, and the trial court misused its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12747 - 2005-03-31
was unduly harsh and excessive based on his minimal prior record, and the trial court misused its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12747 - 2005-03-31
State v. Marquis O. Gilliam
a hearing problem. But I think that, based on the record that’s been made, there is a basis for striking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15512 - 2005-03-31
a hearing problem. But I think that, based on the record that’s been made, there is a basis for striking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15512 - 2005-03-31
Donivan Molitor v. Rusk County Board of Adjustment
review the record as augmented by the second board hearing. See Lakeshore Dev. Corp. v. Plan Comm’n, 12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3053 - 2005-03-31
review the record as augmented by the second board hearing. See Lakeshore Dev. Corp. v. Plan Comm’n, 12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3053 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Demitrius Goodlow
to a crime; because the evidence in the record did not support the submission of lesser-included offenses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14910 - 2017-09-21
to a crime; because the evidence in the record did not support the submission of lesser-included offenses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14910 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Edward J. Brantley
that the record shows Brantley knowingly entered his plea and that he has not demonstrated that an actual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5776 - 2017-09-19
that the record shows Brantley knowingly entered his plea and that he has not demonstrated that an actual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5776 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
to the circuit court for a writ of certiorari. The court denied the petition on grounds that record evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31988 - 2008-03-04
to the circuit court for a writ of certiorari. The court denied the petition on grounds that record evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31988 - 2008-03-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the report, the response, the supplemental report, and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=702298 - 2023-09-14
of the report, the response, the supplemental report, and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=702298 - 2023-09-14
[PDF]
WI APP 44
and the other posing as the daughter. The telephone conversation was intercepted and recorded by another
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35869 - 2014-09-15
and the other posing as the daughter. The telephone conversation was intercepted and recorded by another
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35869 - 2014-09-15
2008 WI APP 136
clearly erroneous. Upon a thorough review of the record, we agree with the State that any finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33680 - 2008-09-23
clearly erroneous. Upon a thorough review of the record, we agree with the State that any finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33680 - 2008-09-23
State v. Edward J. Brantley
Brantley requested a new attorney prior to sentencing. We conclude that the record shows Brantley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5776 - 2005-03-31
Brantley requested a new attorney prior to sentencing. We conclude that the record shows Brantley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5776 - 2005-03-31